It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CETXP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CETXP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CETXP (@Packaged Software) experienced а +11.78% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.80%.
CETXP is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
CETXP | TTD | CETXP / TTD | |
Capitalization | N/A | 42.7B | - |
EBITDA | -4.79M | 281M | -2% |
Gain YTD | 246.875 | -26.708 | -924% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 242.50 | - |
Revenue | 59.8M | 1.95B | 3% |
Total Cash | 67K | 1.38B | 0% |
Total Debt | 5.82M | 236M | 2% |
CETXP | TTD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CETXP's Valuation (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TTD (92) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that CETXP’s stock grew significantly faster than TTD’s over the last 12 months.
TTD's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CETXP (100) in the null industry. This means that TTD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CETXP’s over the last 12 months.
TTD's SMR Rating (50) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CETXP (100) in the null industry. This means that TTD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CETXP’s over the last 12 months.
CETXP's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as TTD (44) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that CETXP’s stock grew similarly to TTD’s over the last 12 months.
TTD's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is in the same range as CETXP (100) in the null industry. This means that TTD’s stock grew similarly to CETXP’s over the last 12 months.
CETXP | TTD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago82% | 1 day ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago73% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CETXP and NTWK have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CETXP and NTWK's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CETXP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CETXP | 100% | N/A | ||
NTWK - CETXP | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.12% | ||
VS - CETXP | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.56% | ||
VRAR - CETXP | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
KARO - CETXP | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
TTD - CETXP | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.34% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTD has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTD jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TTD | 100% | +1.34% | ||
CLSK - TTD | 68% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
COIN - TTD | 66% Closely correlated | -1.27% | ||
RIOT - TTD | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
SAIL - TTD | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
DDOG - TTD | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
More |