Advertisement
DDOG vs TTD
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Datadog (DDOG) vs. The Trade Desk (TTD) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- DDOG commands a premium valuation with a P/E ratio (price-to-earnings ratio) exceeding 460, driven by its role in cloud observability amid rising AI infrastructure demands.
- TTD offers a more attractive P/E of around 27, supported by stronger year-to-date gains of 35.67% compared to DDOG's 6.57%.
- Recent analyst upgrades for TTD to Neutral and positive AI tool news for DDOG signal shifting sentiment in recent weeks.
- Both face earnings on May 7, with DDOG analysts projecting 26% upside potential versus TTD's comparable targets.
- DDOG benefits from AI observability tailwinds, while TTD leverages ad spending recovery in digital programmatic markets.
Introduction
Datadog (DDOG) and The Trade Desk (TTD) represent high-growth players in cloud software and digital advertising, respectively, both exposed to AI-driven transformations. Investors comparing these stocks assess relative performance in SaaS (software-as-a-service) metrics, market momentum, and sector catalysts. Traders focused on tech volatility, upcoming earnings, and AI infrastructure may find this analysis valuable for positioning amid recent market shifts. This comparison highlights key financials, recent developments, and head-to-head contrasts to inform stock comparison strategies in the current environment.
DDOG Overview and Recent Performance
Datadog (DDOG) provides an observability and security platform for cloud applications, monitoring infrastructure, logs, and AI workloads across servers, databases, and more. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience, trading around $145 with a market cap over $51 billion. Year-to-date returns stand at 6.57%, with one-year gains at 38%, amid broader volatility. Sentiment has lifted on launches like GPU monitoring tools targeting AI infrastructure costs, crossing key trendlines ahead of earnings. Analysts maintain Buy ratings with targets implying significant upside, though high P/E reflects growth expectations tempered by FY2026 guidance.
TTD Overview and Recent Performance
The Trade Desk (TTD) operates a demand-side platform (DSP) for programmatic digital advertising across CTV (connected TV), video, display, and more, serving agencies and advertisers globally. Shares trade near $24 with a $11.6 billion market cap. Recent performance includes robust YTD gains of 35.67% and 55% over one year, outperforming in ad tech recovery. Upgrades like Wedbush to Neutral highlight partnerships such as DramaBox and anticipated ad spend rebound, despite occasional dips against market gains. Lower P/E around 27 suggests relative value, with earnings looming as a catalyst.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots employ real-time AI signals for styles ranging from short-term scalping to longer holds, with annualized returns spanning +23% to +162%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Featured bots target sectors like semiconductors, industrials, data centers, and ETFs, executing hundreds of trades with drawdowns managed via advanced risk metrics. Explore these high-conviction options tailored to current market conditions for potential edge in volatile environments.
Head-to-Head Comparison
DDOG’s observability model thrives on recurring SaaS subscriptions tied to cloud scaling and AI ops, contrasting TTD’s transaction-based fees from ad spend volume, exposing it to cyclical marketing budgets. Growth drivers differ: DDOG leverages AI monitoring demand, while TTD benefits from CTV and programmatic shifts. Recent momentum favors TTD YTD, but DDOG shows trend stability. Risks include DDOG’s elevated valuation vulnerable to slowdowns and TTD’s ad sector sensitivity. In software versus communication services, sentiment tilts toward AI infrastructure for DDOG, value for TTD.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward DDOG with moderate conviction, citing consistent AI catalyst momentum, analyst upside, and observability positioning amid cloud expansion. While TTD offers compelling value and YTD strength, DDOG’s trend alignment suggests higher probability of near-term outperformance, pending earnings outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDOG is a Hold and TTD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DDOG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- DDOG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TTD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DDOG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTD’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DDOG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TTD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
DDOG (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.44% price change this week, while TTD (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was -5.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was +2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
DDOG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
TTD is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.38% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Advertising/Marketing Services (+2.68% weekly)Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.
| DDOG | TTD | DDOG / TTD | |
| Capitalization | 80.7B | 8.54B | 945% |
| EBITDA | 229M | 716M | 32% |
| Gain YTD | 66.652 | -52.160 | -128% |
| P/E Ratio | 581.10 | 20.64 | 2,816% |
| Revenue | 3.67B | 2.97B | 124% |
| Total Cash | 4.76B | 1.41B | 338% |
| Total Debt | 1.29B | 424M | 303% |
DDOG | TTD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TTD's Valuation (75) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is in the same range as DDOG (95) in the null industry. This means that TTD’s stock grew similarly to DDOG’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTD (100) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that DDOG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTD’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TTD (100) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that DDOG’s stock grew similarly to TTD’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTD (85) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that DDOG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTD’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TTD (99) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that DDOG’s stock grew significantly faster than TTD’s over the last 12 months.
| DDOG | TTD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 77% | 18 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
TTD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTD has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTD jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTD | 100% | -4.22% | ||
| CLSK - TTD | 68% Closely correlated | -2.78% | ||
| COIN - TTD | 66% Closely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| RIOT - TTD | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| SAIL - TTD | 60% Loosely correlated | -6.25% | ||
| DDOG - TTD | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
More | ||||