CFFI
Price
$88.39
Change
-$0.09 (-0.10%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
287.42M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UVSP
Price
$43.16
Change
+$0.19 (+0.44%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFFI vs UVSP

CFFI vs UVSP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) vs. Univest Financial Corporation (UVSP) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is a Virginia-based community bank holding company with a market capitalization of approximately $258 million, while Univest Financial Corporation (UVSP) is a Pennsylvania-based diversified financial services firm with a market cap near $1.24 billion — reflecting a significant size disparity.
  • CFFI reported strong second-quarter 2026 results with net income rising 11.1% year over year and expanding net interest margin (NIM) to 4.41%, supported by robust loan growth and a strategic securities portfolio restructuring.
  • UVSP has delivered a standout year-to-date return of approximately 35–38%, significantly outperforming the broader market, though its most recent quarterly earnings missed consensus estimates.
  • Both stocks operate in the regional banking sector and share exposure to interest rate dynamics, but CFFI offers a higher dividend yield and lower valuation multiples, while UVSP provides greater liquidity and a more diversified revenue base, including wealth management and insurance.
  • AI-driven analysis suggests a nuanced preference depending on whether an investor prioritizes valuation and margin momentum versus scale, liquidity, and recent price trend strength.

Introduction

Regional banks play a critical role in the U.S. financial ecosystem, and comparing two publicly traded names in this space — CFFI (C&F Financial Corporation) and UVSP (Univest Financial Corporation) — offers valuable perspective for investors evaluating community and super-community banking institutions. Despite sharing a broad industry classification, these two companies differ markedly in scale, geographic footprint, business model composition, and recent market momentum. This stock comparison examines their relative performance, key developments in recent weeks, and the factors shaping market positioning, providing a data-driven framework for traders and long-term investors assessing the regional banking landscape.

CFFI Overview and Recent Performance

CFFI, or C&F Financial Corporation, is the holding company for C&F Bank, headquartered in Toano, Virginia. The company operates through three primary segments: community banking, mortgage banking, and consumer finance. With 32 banking offices and six commercial loan offices across Virginia and a market capitalization of roughly $258 million, CFFI is firmly positioned as a community-focused regional bank approaching its 100th anniversary in 2027.

In recent weeks, CFFI reported its second-quarter 2026 results, posting consolidated net income of $8.6 million, an 11.1% increase from the prior-year period. For the first six months of 2026, net income reached $15.4 million, up 17.2% year over year. The company's consolidated net interest margin expanded to 4.41%, reflecting higher average loan balances and improved securities yields following a strategic portfolio restructuring. Community banking segment loans grew 8.2% from the prior year, while mortgage banking originations rose 9.5% amid a more favorable mortgage rate environment.

The stock has delivered a year-to-date return of approximately 10.8% and a one-year return near 22%, supported by consistent earnings improvement and strategic expansion into Southwest Virginia, including the recent hiring of a veteran lender in Lynchburg. With a low beta of 0.34 and a trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 8.85, CFFI trades at a notable discount to many regional banking peers. The company maintains a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share, producing a dividend yield of approximately 2.4%. However, trading liquidity is limited, with average daily volume of around 6,000 shares.

UVSP Overview and Recent Performance

UVSP, or Univest Financial Corporation, is a significantly larger financial institution headquartered in Souderton, Pennsylvania. Founded in 1876, Univest operates through its wholly-owned subsidiary Univest Bank and Trust Co. and its insurance, investments, and equipment financing subsidiaries. The company holds approximately $8.6 billion in assets and $5.7 billion in assets under management and supervision (AUM/A) through its wealth management division, serving customers through a network of more than 50 offices across the Mid-Atlantic region.

Univest's stock has been a standout performer in 2026, posting a year-to-date gain of approximately 35–38% and a one-year return exceeding 43%, outpacing both the S&P 500 and most regional banking peers. The stock recently traded near $44 per share, close to its 52-week high of $45.46, reflecting sustained upward momentum. The company's market capitalization stands at roughly $1.24 billion, with a trailing P/E ratio of approximately 12.8 and a dividend yield near 2.1%. Unlike CFFI, UVSP benefits from significantly higher trading liquidity, with average daily volume exceeding 200,000 shares.

Despite the strong price performance, Univest's most recent quarterly earnings report showed mixed results. The company posted earnings of $0.82 per share for the second quarter of 2026, missing the consensus estimate of $0.86, while revenues also fell short of expectations. Nevertheless, Univest's diversified business model — encompassing traditional banking, wealth management, insurance, and equipment financing — provides multiple revenue streams and some insulation from interest-rate-only headwinds. Analyst sentiment remains cautiously constructive, with Keefe, Bruyette & Woods maintaining a Market Perform rating and an average price target suggesting moderate upside potential.

Trending AI Robots

For traders looking to augment their decision-making with data-driven tools, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most promising AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots employ diverse trading styles, strategies, and timeframes — from swing trading to trend-following and pattern recognition — each with its own verifiable performance statistics, win/loss ratios, and trade history. Investors can explore bots tailored to specific sectors, market caps, or technical setups, making it easier to find an approach that resonates with their individual goals. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to discover which strategies are currently leading in today's market environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing CFFI and UVSP, several key contrasts emerge. From a scale perspective, UVSP is roughly five times larger by market capitalization and operates with approximately $8.6 billion in total assets, compared to CFFI's more modest $2.77 billion asset base. This size differential translates into deeper liquidity, broader analyst coverage, and greater institutional ownership for Univest.

In terms of valuation, CFFI appears more attractively priced on traditional metrics, with a trailing P/E ratio below 9 and a price-to-book ratio around 0.92 — both significantly lower than UVSP's P/E of approximately 12.8 and price-to-book near 0.98. CFFI also offers a higher dividend yield, which may appeal to income-oriented investors.

On operational momentum, CFFI demonstrated stronger net interest margin expansion and loan growth in its most recent quarter, while UVSP reported an earnings miss. However, Univest's diversified revenue mix — including wealth management, insurance, and equipment finance — provides broader earnings stability and reduces dependence on net interest income alone. This diversification has helped fuel UVSP's superior year-to-date and one-year price performance.

Risk profiles also differ. CFFI carries a notably low beta of 0.34, indicating relatively low correlation with broader market swings, which may suit risk-averse investors. Its consumer finance segment, however, continues to experience elevated net charge-off rates. UVSP, with a beta of 0.65, is somewhat more sensitive to market volatility but benefits from geographic diversification across the Mid-Atlantic region and a broader suite of financial services.

From a sentiment standpoint, UVSP currently enjoys stronger price momentum, trading near its 52-week high, whereas CFFI has experienced some recent softness, declining modestly over the past month despite solid fundamental results. This divergence highlights how market sentiment can temporarily decouple from underlying operational performance in the regional banking sector.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trends, relative positioning, and the contrasting profiles of these two regional banks, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely show a nuanced preference. For traders prioritizing valuation, margin expansion, and fundamental stability, CFFI presents compelling metrics — including a sub-9 P/E ratio, an expanding net interest margin above 4.4%, and strong loan growth — that suggest the stock may be undervalued relative to its earnings power. The company's ongoing geographic expansion and securities portfolio restructuring also represent tangible catalysts that could support future performance.

Conversely, for strategies emphasizing trend consistency, liquidity, and price momentum, UVSP would likely register as the stronger candidate. Its year-to-date rally of roughly 35–38%, diversified revenue base, and higher trading volume create a more favorable technical profile for AI models that weight recent price behavior heavily. The recent earnings miss introduces some caution, but the broader uptrend remains intact. Ultimately, the AI verdict would depend on the specific strategy parameters employed, though the probabilistic edge would tend to favor UVSP for momentum-based approaches and CFFI for value-oriented and mean-reversion strategies.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CFFI vs. UVSP commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFI is a Hold and UVSP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (CFFI: $88.39 vs. UVSP: $43.16)
Brand notoriety: CFFI and UVSP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFI: 19% vs. UVSP: 38%
Market capitalization -- CFFI: $287.42M vs. UVSP: $1.19B
CFFI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $287.42M. UVSP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUVSP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UVSP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CFFI and UVSP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UVSP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UVSP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UVSP is a better buy in the short-term than CFFI.

Price Growth

CFFI (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.51% price change this week, while UVSP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

UVSP is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.33% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UVSP($1.19B) has a higher market cap than CFFI($287M). UVSP has higher P/E ratio than CFFI: UVSP (12.47) vs CFFI (9.85). UVSP YTD gains are higher at: 34.142 vs. CFFI (23.358). UVSP has more cash in the bank: 69.6M vs. CFFI (15.3M). CFFI has less debt than UVSP: CFFI (103M) vs UVSP (302M). UVSP has higher revenues than CFFI: UVSP (336M) vs CFFI (140M).
CFFIUVSPCFFI / UVSP
Capitalization287M1.19B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.35834.14268%
P/E Ratio9.8512.4779%
Revenue140M336M42%
Total Cash15.3M69.6M22%
Total Debt103M302M34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFFI vs UVSP: Fundamental Ratings
CFFI
UVSP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4866
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3829
SMR RATING
1..100
5952
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4336
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFFI's Valuation (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UVSP (44). This means that CFFI’s stock grew similarly to UVSP’s over the last 12 months.

UVSP's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (38). This means that UVSP’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

UVSP's SMR Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (59). This means that UVSP’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

CFFI's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UVSP (44). This means that CFFI’s stock grew similarly to UVSP’s over the last 12 months.

UVSP's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (43). This means that UVSP’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFIUVSP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFFI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UVSP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FZAEX53.08N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Focused Em Mkts Z
BRMIX18.40N/A
N/A
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Instl
PNRZX89.15N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Z
UAPIX108.42N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Inv
HRVIX45.08N/A
N/A
Heartland Value Plus Investor

CFFI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFI has been loosely correlated with FIBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFFI jumps, then FIBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFFI
1D Price
Change %
CFFI100%
-0.10%
FIBK - CFFI
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
PFS - CFFI
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
FMBH - CFFI
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
UMBF - CFFI
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
UVSP - CFFI
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
More

UVSP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UVSP has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UVSP jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UVSP
1D Price
Change %
UVSP100%
+0.44%
FMBH - UVSP
87%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
BY - UVSP
86%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
UBSI - UVSP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
THFF - UVSP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
EFSC - UVSP
85%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
More