CFG
Price
$48.14
Change
+$1.21 (+2.58%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
20.77B
64 days until earnings call
FITB
Price
$42.24
Change
+$0.97 (+2.35%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
27.96B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs FITB

Header iconCFG vs FITB Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs FITBBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$48.14
Change+$1.21 (+2.58%)
Volume$3.85M
Capitalization20.77B
Fifth Third Ban
Price$42.24
Change+$0.97 (+2.35%)
Volume$3.53M
Capitalization27.96B
CFG vs FITB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. FITB commentary
Aug 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a Buy and FITB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $48.14 vs. FITB: $42.24)
Brand notoriety: CFG and FITB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 63% vs. FITB: 66%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $20.77B vs. FITB: $27.96B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $20.77B. FITB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $27.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFITB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FITB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CFG and FITB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FITB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FITB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the short-term than FITB.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.78% price change this week, while FITB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

FITB is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FITB($28B) has a higher market cap than CFG($20.8B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than FITB: CFG (14.31) vs FITB (13.16). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 13.205 vs. FITB (1.774). CFG has less debt than FITB: CFG (12.3B) vs FITB (19.7B). FITB has higher revenues than CFG: FITB (8.29B) vs CFG (7.77B).
CFGFITBCFG / FITB
Capitalization20.8B28B74%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.2051.774744%
P/E Ratio14.3113.16109%
Revenue7.77B8.29B94%
Total Cash11.5BN/A-
Total Debt12.3B19.7B62%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs FITB: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
FITB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7158
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4239
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4957
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5842
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFG's Valuation (75) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FITB (84). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (42). This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's SMR Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (7). This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FITB (57). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (58). This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGFITB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMID34.060.72
+2.16%
Argent Mid Cap ETF
GVUS50.670.44
+0.88%
Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpValEqETF
SIVR36.110.23
+0.64%
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
ZDEK24.920.10
+0.38%
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrDec
MFLX16.480.05
+0.27%
First Trust Flexible Muncpl Hgh Inc ETF

FITB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITB has been closely correlated with PNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FITB jumps, then PNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FITB
1D Price
Change %
FITB100%
+2.35%
PNC - FITB
91%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
HBAN - FITB
90%
Closely correlated
+2.87%
CFG - FITB
90%
Closely correlated
+2.58%
USB - FITB
89%
Closely correlated
+2.72%
MTB - FITB
89%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
More