CFG
Price
$42.74
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
80 days until earnings call
MTB
Price
$197.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CFG vs MTB

Header iconCFG vs MTB Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs MTBBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$42.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.16M
CapitalizationN/A
M&T Bank
Price$197.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.01M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CFG vs MTB Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CFG vs. MTB commentary
Oct 30, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a Buy and MTB is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 30, 2024
Stock price -- (CFG: $42.74 vs. MTB: $197.23)
Brand notoriety: CFG and MTB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 81% vs. MTB: 84%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $16.64B vs. MTB: $24.23B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $16.64B. MTB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $24.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the long-term than MTB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MTB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CFG and MTB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.09% price change this week, while MTB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2025.

MTB is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTB($24.2B) has a higher market cap than CFG($16.6B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than MTB: CFG (11.39) vs MTB (9.07). MTB YTD gains are higher at: 47.694 vs. CFG (33.453). MTB has less debt than CFG: MTB (13.2B) vs CFG (14B). MTB has higher revenues than CFG: MTB (9.4B) vs CFG (8.22B).
CFGMTBCFG / MTB
Capitalization16.6B24.2B69%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.45347.69470%
P/E Ratio11.399.07126%
Revenue8.22B9.4B88%
Total Cash11.6BN/A-
Total Debt14B13.2B106%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs MTB: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
MTB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1016
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5135
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
426
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
816
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8514

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFG's Valuation (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (68). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (51). This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's SMR Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (6). This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFG (42). This means that MTB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (16). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGMTB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME22.732.16
+10.50%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X69907.7600001978.460900
+2.91%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL233.401.99
+0.86%
Apple
SPY580.831.79
+0.31%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA262.51-6.68
-2.48%
Tesla

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+2.96%
FITB - CFG
87%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
ZION - CFG
87%
Closely correlated
+2.28%
RF - CFG
86%
Closely correlated
+2.38%
PNC - CFG
85%
Closely correlated
+2.16%
TFC - CFG
85%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
More