In the current market environment of moderating interest rates and sector rotation toward quality dividend payers, comparing CGDV and VYM highlights contrasting strategies for income-oriented investors. Both ETFs target U.S. large-cap companies with attractive dividends, but they cater to different goals: CGDV's active management seeks superior risk-adjusted returns through selective stock picking, while VYM's passive indexing delivers broad high-yield exposure at minimal cost. This ETF comparison reveals how active flexibility stacks up against passive efficiency amid evolving macroeconomic drivers like earnings resilience and yield curve shifts, aiding decisions on sector exposure and fund performance dynamics.
The Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is an actively managed fund launched in February 2022, seeking income exceeding the average U.S. equity yield alongside principal growth. Employing Capital Group's multi-manager "Capital System," it invests primarily in dividend-paying stocks of large established U.S. companies (market caps over $4B), with up to 10% in non-U.S. equities. It holds 53-58 stocks, featuring concentrated positions in top holdings like MSFT (5.7%), NVDA (5.2%), AVGO (4.5%), AMAT (3.9%), and RTX (3.7%).
Sector allocations emphasize technology (27%), industrials (17%), and healthcare (14%), diverging from traditional value benchmarks. The expense ratio is 0.33%, with a 30-day SEC yield of 1.31% and annual turnover around 29%. This non-diversified structure allows dynamic adjustments without fixed rebalancing, prioritizing high-quality firms with dividend potential for long-term compounding.
The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM), inception November 2006, passively tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, focusing on U.S. companies with above-average dividend yields (excluding REITs). Using full replication, it holds 559 stocks, weighted by market cap, for broad large-value exposure.
Top holdings include AVGO (6.5%), JPM (3.4%), XOM (2.8%), JNJ (2.6%), and WMT (2.5%). Sectors are led by financials (19%), technology (12-15%), industrials (13%), and healthcare (13%). With an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.04%, 30-day SEC yield near 2.3%, and low turnover (11%), VYM emphasizes cost efficiency and stability in high-dividend sector exposure.
Dividend-focused large-value ETFs like CGDV and VYM thrive in environments of persistent inflation moderation and anticipated rate cuts, where yield-hungry capital flows into resilient sectors. Financials and energy benefit from strong earnings cycles, while technology's quality subset counters valuation concerns amid AI-driven productivity gains. Macro drivers include steady U.S. GDP growth, commodity stabilization, and geopolitical tensions favoring defensive staples and utilities. Regulatory scrutiny on buybacks minimally impacts these funds, but sector risks like energy volatility and financial credit cycles loom. Capital has rotated into high-quality dividends over recent market cycles, bolstering relative positioning for both amid broader equity dispersion.
In recent months, CGDV has shown relative strength over VYM, driven by its technology and industrials overweight capturing sector rotation and earnings momentum from holdings like NVDA and MSFT. Over broader cycles since inception, CGDV's active picks have delivered superior total returns with lower downside capture versus the S&P 500, benefiting from quality filters amid volatility spikes.
VYM, meanwhile, exhibits steadier behavior tied to its financials and energy anchors, performing resiliently in high-rate periods but lagging in growth-led rallies. Volatility differences favor CGDV's nuanced exposure in choppy markets, while VYM's diversification shines in prolonged value rotations. Interest rate expectations and commodity trends continue to influence their relative positioning, with CGDV gaining from momentum and VYM from yield stability.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like trend-following, mean reversion, and momentum, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, real-time performers rise to this curated section, helping traders identify tools aligned with current volatility, sector trends, or macroeconomic shifts. Explore these bots to enhance your ETF trading decisions—visit today to deploy proven AI signals tailored to dynamic markets.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors CGDV for its structural advantages in trend consistency, sector momentum toward technology and quality industrials, and active risk management yielding better recent relative performance. While VYM excels in cost efficiency and diversification, CGDV's concentrated high-conviction holdings offer a probabilistic edge (estimated 60-65% outperformance likelihood over 12 months) in growth-oriented dividend environments, barring sharp value reversals.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| CGDV | VYM | CGDV / VYM | |
| Gain YTD | 12.735 | 12.622 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 36.4B | 96.2B | 38% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.04 | 825% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 11.00 | 264% |
| Yield | 1.19 | 2.30 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 20 years | - |
| CGDV | VYM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 67% | 15 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| STPZ | 52.94 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | |||
| BSJV | 26.14 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco BulletShares 2031 HY Corp Bd ETF | |||
| AGMI | 62.22 | N/A | N/A |
| Themes Silver Miners ETF | |||
| BBAX | 60.44 | -0.14 | -0.23% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders Dev APAC ex-JpnETF | |||
| JOBX | 14.78 | -3.27 | -18.12% |
| Tradr 2X Long JOBY Daily ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGDV has been loosely correlated with SWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGDV jumps, then SWK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDV | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| SWK - CGDV | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.45% | ||
| MS - CGDV | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| GE - CGDV | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.09% | ||
| RCL - CGDV | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| MRVL - CGDV | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||