Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMFCX
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMFCX
Invesco Comstock Select R
Price$33.19
Change+$0.11 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets780.32M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.41
Change+$0.52 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.56B
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CGRNX (780M). RMFCX (1.21) and CGRNX (1.16) have matching dividends . CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CGRNX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CGRNX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.88 vs. CGRNX (-7.55). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.88 vs. CGRNX (32.76).
| CGRNX | RMFCX | CGRNX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.713 | 13.504 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 780M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.21 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.55 | 4.88 | -155% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.62 | 26.38 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.76 | 50.88 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.61 | 86.17 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement