Ad is loading...
CGRNX vs RMFCX
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMFCX
Invesco Comstock Select R
Price$28.84
Change+$0.10 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets710.23M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.02
Change+$0.19 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.75B
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.8B vs. CGRNX (710M). CGRNX (1.37) and RMFCX (1.34) have matching dividends . CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CGRNX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CGRNX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CGRNX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.67 vs. CGRNX (-12.25). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.22 vs. CGRNX (43.91).
| CGRNX | RMFCX | CGRNX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.91 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.517 | -0.733 | 480% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 710M | 98.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.34 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.25 | 4.67 | -262% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.74 | 13.31 | -73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.91 | 51.22 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.08 | 56.86 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers