Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMFCX
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMFCX
Invesco Comstock Select R
Price$32.52
Change+$0.21 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets785.11M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. CGRNX (785M). RMFCX (1.27) and CGRNX (1.26) have matching dividends . CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CGRNX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CGRNX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CGRNX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. CGRNX (-1.04). RMFCX (61.83) and CGRNX (59.35) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CGRNX | RMFCX | CGRNX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.91 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.508 | 9.596 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 785M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.27 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.04 | 11.47 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.73 | 29.27 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.35 | 61.83 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.37 | 79.21 | 19% |