Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMFCX
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMFCX
Invesco Comstock Select R
Price$31.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets749.83M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.96
Change+$0.32 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.64B
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. CGRNX (750M). CGRNX (1.38) and RMFCX (1.31) have matching dividends . CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CGRNX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CGRNX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CGRNX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.47 vs. CGRNX (-4.89). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.07 vs. CGRNX (50.18).
| CGRNX | RMFCX | CGRNX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.91 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.070 | 6.832 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 750M | 106B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.31 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.89 | 9.47 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.73 | 28.22 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.18 | 61.07 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.47 | 71.75 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement