CHAT
Price
$87.28
Change
+$1.70 (+1.99%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.86B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IGV
Price
$101.85
Change
-$0.60 (-0.59%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
14.26B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHAT vs IGV

CHAT vs IGV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) vs. iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV)

Key Takeaways

  • CHAT is an actively managed thematic ETF targeting generative artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies with a higher expense ratio of 0.75%, while IGV is a passive ETF tracking a North American software sector index at a lower 0.38% expense ratio.
  • CHAT typically holds 50-55 securities with concentrated exposure to AI leaders such as NVIDIA Corp (NVDA) and Alphabet Inc (GOOGL), whereas IGV maintains broader diversification across approximately 106 holdings focused on software companies including Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW) and Microsoft Corp (MSFT).
  • Sector allocations differ notably: CHAT emphasizes generative AI themes across technology and communication services with some international exposure, while IGV concentrates on application and systems software segments within North American equities.
  • Both ETFs provide targeted technology exposure but serve distinct investor objectives—CHAT for thematic AI conviction and IGV for established software industry representation.
  • Structural differences in management style, cost, and holdings concentration influence relative risk profiles and positioning within broader technology sector rotations.
  • Liquidity profiles favor both ETFs for institutional and retail investors, though IGV generally exhibits higher average daily trading volume due to its longer history and broader appeal.

Introduction

Investors seeking technology exposure often evaluate specialized exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that capture distinct segments of the sector. The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) both focus on innovative technology themes but pursue different strategies. CHAT offers active management centered on generative AI, while IGV delivers passive exposure to software companies. These funds do not compete directly but provide complementary or alternative avenues for investors targeting AI-driven growth and software sector dynamics amid ongoing digital transformation trends.

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) Overview

The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is an actively managed fund launched in May 2023 that seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in 25 to 55 global equity securities involved in generative AI and related technologies. As of recent data, the fund holds approximately 53 securities with an expense ratio of 0.75%. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Alphabet Inc (GOOGL), SK hynix Inc, Broadcom Inc (AVGO), and Micron Technology Inc (MU), reflecting concentrated positions in AI hardware, semiconductors, and cloud infrastructure. Sector allocations are dominated by technology and communication services, with notable international exposure. The active strategy allows flexible rebalancing to align with evolving AI themes, distinguishing it from traditional index-based approaches.

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) Overview

The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of North American equities in the software industry, including select interactive media and services firms. Launched in 2001, the ETF maintains roughly 106 holdings and carries an expense ratio of 0.38%. Top holdings generally feature Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW), Microsoft Corp (MSFT), Palantir Technologies Inc (PLTR), CrowdStrike Holdings Inc (CRWD), and Salesforce Inc (CRM). Sector allocations center on application software (approximately 52%) and systems software (approximately 43%), providing targeted exposure within the North American market. The market-cap-weighted methodology supports consistent rebalancing aligned with index constituents.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector, particularly software and artificial intelligence, continues to experience robust capital flows driven by enterprise digital transformation, cloud adoption, and generative AI advancements. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and corporate capital expenditure cycles influence sector performance. Regulatory developments around data privacy, antitrust scrutiny of large technology platforms, and export controls on advanced semiconductors represent ongoing risks. Both ETFs benefit from secular growth in software spending but face potential volatility from valuation compression in high-growth names during periods of shifting monetary policy or economic uncertainty.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, CHAT has exhibited higher volatility consistent with its concentrated thematic focus on emerging AI technologies and active management decisions. IGV has demonstrated more measured movements tied to established software earnings trends and broader sector rotation patterns. Relative positioning highlights CHAT’s sensitivity to AI-specific catalysts such as new model releases or semiconductor demand surges, compared with IGV’s alignment with recurring software subscription revenue stability. Both funds have participated in technology rallies during favorable earnings seasons while navigating broader market adjustments related to interest rate sentiment.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional insights.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification across software holdings, and established passive indexing methodology, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorability to the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and consistent sector representation within the current technology environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CHAT vs. IGV commentary
Aug 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHAT is a Hold and IGV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IGV has more net assets: 14.3B vs. CHAT (1.86B). CHAT has a higher annual dividend yield than IGV: CHAT (45.149) vs IGV (-3.048). CHAT was incepted earlier than IGV: CHAT (3 years) vs IGV (25 years). IGV (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than CHAT (0.75). CHAT has a higher turnover IGV (20.00) vs IGV (20.00).
CHATIGVCHAT / IGV
Gain YTD45.149-3.048-1,481%
Net Assets1.86B14.3B13%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.39192%
Turnover92.0020.00460%
Yield2.020.0211,370%
Fund Existence3 years25 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHATIGV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IGV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSMPX345.48N/A
N/A
Vanguard MStar Total Stk Mkt Idx Inst Pl
VCULX19.05N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Growth
FIUSX39.59N/A
N/A
Nomura Opportunity A
TAAGX18.08N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan Small/Mid Cap Growth Cl A
TIEHX18.04N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Eq I

CHAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHAT has been closely correlated with COHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHAT jumps, then COHR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHAT
1D Price
Change %
CHAT100%
-2.75%
COHR - CHAT
70%
Closely correlated
-4.85%
ANET - CHAT
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
HPE - CHAT
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
ORCL - CHAT
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
DELL - CHAT
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
More

IGV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGV has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IGV jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGV
1D Price
Change %
IGV100%
-0.89%
CRM - IGV
74%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
ASAN - IGV
70%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
ESTC - IGV
70%
Closely correlated
-3.14%
DSGX - IGV
69%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
ZETA - IGV
69%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
More