CHAT
Price
$88.79
Change
-$4.73 (-5.06%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
1.95B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LRNZ
Price
$61.92
Change
-$1.81 (-2.84%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
40.3M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHAT vs LRNZ

CHAT vs LRNZ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) vs. TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ)

Key Takeaways

  • Both CHAT and LRNZ are actively managed thematic exchange-traded funds (ETFs) focused on artificial intelligence (AI) and technology, yet they differ in concentration, with LRNZ maintaining a more concentrated portfolio of 25 holdings compared to CHAT’s 45 holdings.
  • CHAT targets companies across generative AI platforms, infrastructure, and enterprise applications, while LRNZ emphasizes technology firms with advanced AI and deep learning capabilities that provide competitive advantages in their industries.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.75% for CHAT and 0.68% for LRNZ, reflecting modest cost differences that may influence long-term net returns for investors.
  • Sector exposure for both centers on information technology, though CHAT includes broader global technology names and LRNZ maintains a tighter focus on secular growth companies with lower correlation to broad market indices.
  • Structural characteristics such as active management and thematic objectives position these ETFs as alternatives rather than direct competitors, appealing to investors seeking differentiated AI exposure within the technology sector.
  • Liquidity profiles and rebalancing approaches align with active strategies, allowing portfolio managers flexibility in security selection amid evolving AI trends.

Introduction

Investors seeking targeted exposure to artificial intelligence and related technologies often evaluate specialized ETFs like the Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and the TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). These funds do not compete head-to-head as identical benchmarks but instead offer alternative strategies within the broader AI and technology theme. CHAT emphasizes generative AI innovations across platforms and infrastructure, while LRNZ concentrates on companies leveraging deep learning for industry-specific advantages. Comparing them helps investors understand differences in diversification, cost, and thematic depth when constructing portfolios aligned with AI-driven growth opportunities.

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) Overview

The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is an actively managed fund launched in May 2023 that seeks exposure to companies involved in generative artificial intelligence. It tracks no specific index but follows an active strategy with a portfolio of 45 holdings as of recent data. Top holdings include NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Alphabet Inc (GOOGL), Broadcom Inc (AVGO), Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD), and Micron Technology Inc (MU), reflecting emphasis on semiconductors and software platforms. Sector allocations concentrate in information technology, with additional exposure to related global technology firms. The expense ratio is 0.75%. Distinguishing features include its focus on generative AI platforms, infrastructure hardware, enterprise software, and consumer applications, supported by active management that allows adjustments to emerging innovations.

TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) Overview

The TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) is an actively managed fund launched in February 2020 that targets technology companies significantly involved in artificial intelligence and deep learning. It maintains a concentrated portfolio of 25 holdings. The strategy prioritizes firms with innovative AI solutions that confer competitive advantages, resulting in lower correlation to broad market indices. Sector allocations focus primarily on information technology. The expense ratio is 0.68%. Key features include qualitative fundamental research by portfolio managers with deep technology sector expertise, annual rebalancing, and a thematic emphasis on secular growth companies applying advanced AI within their businesses.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The artificial intelligence sector continues to experience robust capital flows driven by rapid adoption of generative tools and deep learning applications across industries. Macroeconomic drivers include enterprise demand for productivity-enhancing technologies amid evolving interest rate environments and regulatory scrutiny of data privacy and AI ethics. Capital inflows into AI-themed investments reflect optimism around infrastructure buildout and software commercialization. Risks encompass technological obsolescence, intense competition, concentration in semiconductor supply chains, and potential policy changes affecting global technology trade. Both ETFs operate within this dynamic environment, where sector momentum depends on earnings cycles of leading technology firms and broader shifts in capital allocation toward innovation-driven growth.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the funds have exhibited performance patterns tied to AI sector rotation and earnings momentum of major technology holdings. CHAT’s broader holdings base provides diversified exposure that may moderate volatility relative to more concentrated strategies during periods of uneven AI adoption. LRNZ’s focused approach has aligned with strong secular trends in deep learning applications, potentially amplifying returns when select companies demonstrate competitive edges. Relative positioning highlights differences in risk exposure, with LRNZ showing lower correlation to broad indices and CHAT incorporating a wider array of global technology participants. Both respond to interest rate expectations and commodity trends affecting semiconductor inputs, though their active mandates allow adaptation to geopolitical and macroeconomic shifts over recent weeks and months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking to compare ETFs or explore additional AI-themed opportunities may benefit from leveraging this resource.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to LRNZ due to its lower expense ratio, concentrated focus on high-conviction AI and deep learning names, and demonstrated lower correlation to broad market indices. CHAT offers compelling diversification through its larger holdings count and explicit generative AI emphasis, which may suit investors prioritizing broader thematic coverage. The choice ultimately depends on individual risk tolerance and desired balance between concentration and breadth within the AI sector.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CHAT vs. LRNZ commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHAT is a Hold and LRNZ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHAT has more net assets: 1.95B vs. LRNZ (40.3M). CHAT has a higher annual dividend yield than LRNZ: CHAT (50.594) vs LRNZ (29.934). CHAT was incepted earlier than LRNZ: CHAT (3 years) vs LRNZ (6 years). LRNZ (0.69) has a lower expense ratio than CHAT (0.75). CHAT has a higher turnover LRNZ (28.00) vs LRNZ (28.00).
CHATLRNZCHAT / LRNZ
Gain YTD50.59429.934169%
Net Assets1.95B40.3M4,849%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.69109%
Turnover32.0028.00114%
Yield1.720.00-
Fund Existence3 years6 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHATLRNZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LRNZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PML7.64N/A
N/A
PIMCO Municipal Income FUND II
NUG8.69N/A
N/A
Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF
BAUG53.62-0.02
-0.03%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF Aug
HFGM30.04-0.19
-0.61%
Unlimited Hfgm Global Macro ETF
MCH27.94-0.96
-3.31%
Matthews China Active ETF

CHAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHAT has been loosely correlated with COHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHAT jumps, then COHR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHAT
1D Price
Change %
CHAT100%
-5.06%
COHR - CHAT
64%
Loosely correlated
-9.57%
ANET - CHAT
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.98%
ORCL - CHAT
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
HPE - CHAT
48%
Loosely correlated
-6.19%
GOOGL - CHAT
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

LRNZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRNZ has been closely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRNZ jumps, then NET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRNZ
1D Price
Change %
LRNZ100%
-2.83%
NET - LRNZ
68%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
SNOW - LRNZ
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
TWLO - LRNZ
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
AI - LRNZ
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
VRNS - LRNZ
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More