CHAT
Price
$104.07
Change
+$1.73 (+1.69%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Net Assets
2.21B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PSI
Price
$184.45
Change
+$6.22 (+3.49%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Net Assets
2.92B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHAT vs PSI

CHAT vs PSI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) vs. Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI)

Key Takeaways

  • CHAT is an actively managed thematic ETF targeting generative AI across platforms, infrastructure, and software, with 42 holdings and heavy exposure to semiconductors like NVDA and AMD.
  • PSI is a passively managed smart beta ETF tracking the Dynamic Semiconductor Intellidex Index, focusing on 30-31 U.S. semiconductor stocks selected via quantitative factors including momentum and value.
  • CHAT offers broader AI-themed diversification (73% technology, 19% communication services) at a higher 0.75% expense ratio, while PSI provides concentrated semiconductor purity (98% technology) at a lower 0.56% expense ratio.
  • Both exhibit high volatility tied to tech cycles, but PSI's longer track record (since 2005) and U.S.-centric focus may appeal to those seeking established sector exposure.
  • Structural differences highlight CHAT's global active flexibility versus PSI's quarterly rebalanced quantitative discipline, influencing risk and adaptability in AI-driven markets.
  • Cost efficiency favors PSI, but CHAT's thematic breadth captures upstream AI enablers beyond pure chip manufacturing.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence and semiconductor innovation, Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) offer compelling yet distinct pathways for investors seeking to capitalize on tech megatrends. While both provide exposure to high-growth technology subsectors, CHAT pursues a thematic active strategy encompassing the full AI ecosystem, whereas PSI delivers targeted passive access to U.S. semiconductor leaders. This comparison is particularly relevant amid surging demand for AI infrastructure, where semiconductors form the foundational backbone but broader AI adoption drives diversified opportunities. Investors weighing these ETFs can assess trade-offs in diversification, costs, and positioning within interconnected tech supply chains.

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) Overview

The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT), issued by Roundhill Investments and launched on May 18, 2023, is an actively managed thematic ETF designed to invest in companies driving generative AI innovations. It does not track a traditional index, instead selecting 25-50 global equities across AI platforms, infrastructure (including semiconductors), enterprise software, and consumer applications. The fund holds approximately 42 securities, with top holdings including NVDA (6.85%), GOOGL (6.49%), AMD (5.78%), Micron Technology (MU, 5.63%), and Broadcom (AVGO, 3.58%). Sector allocations emphasize technology (73%), communication services (19%), and consumer cyclical (7%). The gross expense ratio stands at 0.75%, reflecting active management costs. CHAT's non-diversified structure and global reach, including non-U.S. names, distinguish it as a forward-looking AI pure play with flexibility to adapt to emerging trends.

Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) Overview

The Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI), managed by Invesco and launched on June 23, 2005, is a passively managed fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductor Intellidex Index—a quantitative model selecting around 30 U.S. semiconductor companies based on price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management actions, and value. It holds 30-31 stocks, with leading positions such as MaxLinear (MXL, ~8%), AMD (~6-7%), MU (~5%), Texas Instruments (TXN, ~5%), and AVGO (~4-5%). Sector exposure is nearly 98% technology (semiconductors 65%, equipment 30%, instruments 5%), with minor industrials. The net expense ratio is 0.56%, and the index rebalances quarterly in February, May, August, and November. PSI's non-diversified, U.S.-focused approach emphasizes capital appreciation through factor tilts, offering a battle-tested vehicle for semiconductor sector rotation.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor and AI sectors are propelled by explosive demand for data centers, machine learning accelerators, and generative AI applications, fueled by macroeconomic tailwinds like productivity gains and enterprise digitization. Catalysts include sustained capital expenditures from hyperscalers on AI infrastructure, CHIPS Act subsidies boosting U.S. fabrication, and supply chain reshoring amid geopolitical tensions. Capital flows have concentrated in semiconductors as the AI "picks and shovels" trade, with memory and GPU leaders benefiting from cycle upswings. Regulatory scrutiny on AI ethics and export controls poses risks, alongside cyclical downturns from inventory gluts or softening end-demand. Broader macro drivers—such as interest rate trajectories influencing growth valuations and commodity trends impacting chip inputs—shape the environment, where AI thematics overlay semiconductor fundamentals for compounded growth potential.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent months and market cycles, both CHAT and PSI have demonstrated resilience amid AI hype and semiconductor rallies, though with divergent volatility profiles. PSI, leveraging its quantitative momentum tilt and equipment exposure, has shown relative strength during earnings-driven upswings in fabrication leaders like LRCX and KLAC, benefiting from sector rotation into U.S. manufacturing resurgence. CHAT, with broader AI diversification including software giants, has captured upside from platform leaders like GOOGL and MSFT, exhibiting higher beta to innovation narratives but steeper drawdowns in risk-off periods. Volatility differences stem from PSI's concentrated U.S. chip focus versus CHAT's global active bets; both amplify broader tech moves tied to interest rate expectations and hyperscaler spending, positioning PSI for pure-play cyclicality and CHAT for thematic longevity.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore the AI Screener today to uncover hidden gems in sectors like AI and semiconductors.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors PSI due to its lower expense ratio, established track record, cost efficiency, and concentrated exposure to semiconductor momentum amid ongoing AI infrastructure buildout. While CHAT's active thematic diversification offers appeal in expansive AI adoption phases, PSI's quantitative rebalancing and U.S.-focus align better with observable sector tailwinds and relative trend consistency, suggesting a probabilistic edge (estimated 60-65%) for near-term outperformance on a risk-adjusted basis.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CHAT vs. PSI commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHAT is a Buy and PSI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSI has more net assets: 2.92B vs. CHAT (2.21B). PSI has a higher annual dividend yield than CHAT: PSI (133.917) vs CHAT (76.510). CHAT was incepted earlier than PSI: CHAT (3 years) vs PSI (21 years). PSI (0.56) has a lower expense ratio than CHAT (0.75). PSI has a higher turnover CHAT (32.00) vs CHAT (32.00).
CHATPSICHAT / PSI
Gain YTD76.510133.91757%
Net Assets2.21B2.92B76%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.56134%
Turnover32.0078.0041%
Yield1.720.053,585%
Fund Existence3 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHATPSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWDL62.852.85
+4.75%
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Fctr TR ETN
MLPI55.100.83
+1.53%
NEOS MLP & Engy Infras Hi Inc ETF
GQI58.68-0.04
-0.07%
Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF
FSTA52.05-0.36
-0.69%
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
SAWG23.79-0.17
-0.72%
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Lg Cp Qual Gr ETF

CHAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHAT has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHAT jumps, then MU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHAT
1D Price
Change %
CHAT100%
+1.69%
MU - CHAT
69%
Closely correlated
+6.82%
ARM - CHAT
67%
Closely correlated
-7.22%
NVDA - CHAT
66%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
AMD - CHAT
66%
Closely correlated
+2.65%
AVGO - CHAT
66%
Closely correlated
-4.52%
More

PSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSI has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSI jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSI
1D Price
Change %
PSI100%
+3.50%
LRCX - PSI
86%
Closely correlated
+5.27%
TER - PSI
84%
Closely correlated
+4.36%
SYNA - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
AMAT - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
+3.74%
KLAC - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
+3.70%
More