CHEF
Price
$63.94
Change
-$1.83 (-2.78%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.5B
83 days until earnings call
WILC
Price
$21.51
Change
-$0.68 (-3.06%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
143.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHEF vs WILC

Header iconCHEF vs WILC Comparison
Open Charts CHEF vs WILCBanner chart's image
Chefs' Warehouse (The)
Price$63.94
Change-$1.83 (-2.78%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization1.5B
G Willi-Food International
Price$21.51
Change-$0.68 (-3.06%)
Volume$162
Capitalization143.98M
CHEF vs WILC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WILC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHEF vs. WILC commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHEF is a Hold and WILC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CHEF: $63.94 vs. WILC: $21.41)
Brand notoriety: CHEF and WILC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHEF: 68% vs. WILC: 55%
Market capitalization -- CHEF: $1.5B vs. WILC: $143.98M
CHEF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $1.5B. WILC’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $143.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWILC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WILC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WILC is a better buy in the long-term than CHEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHEF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WILC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WILC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHEF is a better buy in the short-term than WILC.

Price Growth

CHEF (@Food Distributors) experienced а -6.74% price change this week, while WILC (@Food Distributors) price change was +0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHEF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-1.64% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHEF($1.5B) has a higher market cap than WILC($144M). CHEF has higher P/E ratio than WILC: CHEF (41.89) vs WILC (17.60). WILC YTD gains are higher at: 41.271 vs. CHEF (29.643). CHEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 157M vs. WILC (27.3M). WILC has more cash in the bank: 240M vs. CHEF (49.9M). WILC has less debt than CHEF: WILC (2.21M) vs CHEF (926M). CHEF has higher revenues than WILC: CHEF (3.43B) vs WILC (543M).
CHEFWILCCHEF / WILC
Capitalization1.5B144M1,041%
EBITDA157M27.3M575%
Gain YTD29.64341.27172%
P/E Ratio41.8917.60238%
Revenue3.43B543M632%
Total Cash49.9M240M21%
Total Debt926M2.21M41,976%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHEF vs WILC: Fundamental Ratings
CHEF
WILC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7422
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1548
SMR RATING
1..100
5761
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4337
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3736
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WILC's Valuation (21) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHEF (84). This means that WILC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHEF’s over the last 12 months.

CHEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WILC (48). This means that CHEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WILC’s over the last 12 months.

CHEF's SMR Rating (57) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as WILC (61). This means that CHEF’s stock grew similarly to WILC’s over the last 12 months.

WILC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as CHEF (43). This means that WILC’s stock grew similarly to CHEF’s over the last 12 months.

WILC's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as CHEF (37). This means that WILC’s stock grew similarly to CHEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHEFWILC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WILC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTINX12.41N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% I
FFIDX104.07N/A
N/A
Fidelity
PMIYX10.96N/A
N/A
Putnam Multi-Asset Income Y
PNRCX43.70N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources C
PGLOX18.15N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Global Consumer

WILC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WILC and MTEX have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WILC and MTEX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WILC
1D Price
Change %
WILC100%
+1.56%
MTEX - WILC
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
CHEF - WILC
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
USFD - WILC
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
PFGC - WILC
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
ANDE - WILC
12%
Poorly correlated
+4.50%
More