CHEF
Price
$57.15
Change
+$1.03 (+1.84%)
Updated
Oct 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.33B
18 days until earnings call
WILC
Price
$21.04
Change
+$0.23 (+1.11%)
Updated
Oct 10, 03:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
292.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHEF vs WILC

Header iconCHEF vs WILC Comparison
Open Charts CHEF vs WILCBanner chart's image
Chefs' Warehouse (The)
Price$57.15
Change+$1.03 (+1.84%)
Volume$3.32K
Capitalization2.33B
G Willi-Food International
Price$21.04
Change+$0.23 (+1.11%)
Volume$190
Capitalization292.06M
CHEF vs WILC Comparison Chart in %
CHEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WILC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHEF vs. WILC commentary
Oct 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHEF is a StrongBuy and WILC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CHEF: $57.10 vs. WILC: $20.81)
Brand notoriety: CHEF and WILC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHEF: 104% vs. WILC: 13%
Market capitalization -- CHEF: $2.33B vs. WILC: $295.28M
CHEF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $2.33B. WILC’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $295.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $37.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $4.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWILC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WILC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CHEF and WILC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHEF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WILC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WILC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WILC is a better buy in the short-term than CHEF.

Price Growth

CHEF (@Food Distributors) experienced а +2.99% price change this week, while WILC (@Food Distributors) price change was +6.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHEF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-2.15% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHEF($2.33B) has a higher market cap than WILC($292M). CHEF has higher P/E ratio than WILC: CHEF (35.25) vs WILC (10.05). WILC YTD gains are higher at: 36.541 vs. CHEF (15.775). CHEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 213M vs. WILC (94.1M). WILC has more cash in the bank: 214M vs. CHEF (96.9M). WILC has less debt than CHEF: WILC (4.27M) vs CHEF (930M). CHEF has higher revenues than WILC: CHEF (3.95B) vs WILC (598M).
CHEFWILCCHEF / WILC
Capitalization2.33B292M797%
EBITDA213M94.1M226%
Gain YTD15.77536.54143%
P/E Ratio35.2510.05351%
Revenue3.95B598M661%
Total Cash96.9M214M45%
Total Debt930M4.27M21,790%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHEF vs WILC: Fundamental Ratings
CHEF
WILC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6918
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2665
SMR RATING
1..100
5752
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4786
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WILC's Valuation (7) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHEF (83). This means that WILC’s stock grew significantly faster than CHEF’s over the last 12 months.

CHEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WILC (65). This means that CHEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WILC’s over the last 12 months.

WILC's SMR Rating (52) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as CHEF (57). This means that WILC’s stock grew similarly to CHEF’s over the last 12 months.

WILC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as CHEF (60). This means that WILC’s stock grew similarly to CHEF’s over the last 12 months.

CHEF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WILC (86). This means that CHEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WILC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHEFWILC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WILC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRFDX37.75N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Equity Income
BGVCX34.65N/A
N/A
Brandes Global Equity C
CSPYX21.79N/A
N/A
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst3
GSYPX43.14N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value P
JIIGX87.11N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Sustainable Leaders R6

WILC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WILC and USFD have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WILC and USFD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WILC
1D Price
Change %
WILC100%
+1.10%
USFD - WILC
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
CHEF - WILC
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
PFGC - WILC
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
UNFI - WILC
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.01%
SYY - WILC
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More