CHH
Price
$108.54
Change
-$1.32 (-1.20%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.89B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GHG
Price
$1.08
Change
-$0.02 (-1.82%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
108.97M
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHH vs GHG

CHH vs GHG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHH vs. GHG commentary
Aug 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHH is a StrongBuy and GHG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2026
Stock price -- (CHH: $108.54 vs. GHG: $1.08)
Brand notoriety: CHH and GHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHH: 72% vs. GHG: 98%
Market capitalization -- CHH: $4.89B vs. GHG: $108.97M
CHH [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $4.89B. GHG’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $108.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $92.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $21.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGHG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GHG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GHG is a better buy in the long-term than CHH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GHG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHH is a better buy in the short-term than GHG.

Price Growth

CHH (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а -0.65% price change this week, while GHG (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was -1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHH is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

GHG is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (+0.08% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHH($4.89B) has a higher market cap than GHG($109M). GHG has higher P/E ratio than CHH: GHG (21.99) vs CHH (15.37). CHH YTD gains are higher at: 14.904 vs. GHG (-36.095). CHH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 604M vs. GHG (366M). CHH has higher revenues than GHG: CHH (1.61B) vs GHG (1.25B).
CHHGHGCHH / GHG
Capitalization4.89B109M4,482%
EBITDA604M366M165%
Gain YTD14.904-36.095-41%
P/E Ratio15.3721.9970%
Revenue1.61B1.25B129%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.11BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHH vs GHG: Fundamental Ratings
CHH
GHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1283
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
462
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5874
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6613
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GHG's Valuation (6) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHH (76). This means that GHG’s stock grew significantly faster than CHH’s over the last 12 months.

GHG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as CHH (100). This means that GHG’s stock grew similarly to CHH’s over the last 12 months.

CHH's SMR Rating (4) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHG (62). This means that CHH’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHG’s over the last 12 months.

CHH's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as GHG (74). This means that CHH’s stock grew similarly to GHG’s over the last 12 months.

GHG's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHH (66). This means that GHG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHHGHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OPOCX123.130.62
+0.51%
Invesco Discovery A
LIMIX8.52N/A
N/A
Cromwell Tran Focus Instl
SDLAX21.52N/A
N/A
SEI Dynamic Asset Allocation A (SIIT)
VGWIX24.53N/A
N/A
Vanguard Global Wellesley Income Inv
PISJX16.52-0.01
-0.06%
Columbia Pyrford International Stock R

CHH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHH has been loosely correlated with WH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHH jumps, then WH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHH
1D Price
Change %
CHH100%
-1.20%
WH - CHH
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
IHG - CHH
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
HLT - CHH
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
H - CHH
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
HTHT - CHH
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
More

GHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GHG and MAR have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHG and MAR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHG
1D Price
Change %
GHG100%
-1.82%
MAR - GHG
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
H - GHG
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
HLT - GHG
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
CVEO - GHG
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
IHG - GHG
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More