Investors seeking targeted exposure to the semiconductor industry often compare specialized ETFs that track similar but distinct benchmarks. The Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) both provide passive access to semiconductor companies, yet they differ in index methodology, diversification, and cost structure. These funds serve as alternatives rather than direct competitors, appealing to investors with varying preferences for concentration versus breadth in a sector driven by technological innovation and capital expenditure cycles.
The Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) is a passive ETF that seeks to track the Solactive Semiconductor Focus Index. It holds approximately 56 securities, emphasizing companies with significant semiconductor operations that meet certain sustainability criteria. Top holdings typically include MU, AMD, INTC, AMAT, and LRCX. The fund allocates nearly all assets to the technology sector, with a focus on semiconductors and related equipment. Its expense ratio stands at 0.15%. As a non-diversified, physically replicated ETF, CHPS offers global exposure while incorporating ESG screening elements in its selection process.
The iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) is a passive ETF designed to track the NYSE Semiconductor Index (or ICE Semiconductor Index). It maintains a concentrated portfolio of 30 holdings, primarily U.S.-listed companies across the semiconductor value chain. Prominent positions often feature NVDA, AMD, MU, INTC, and AVGO. Nearly all assets reside in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment sub-sectors. The expense ratio is 0.34%. This physically replicated, market-cap weighted fund provides focused exposure to industry leaders without additional ESG overlays.
The semiconductor sector remains central to advancements in artificial intelligence, data centers, automotive electronics, and consumer devices. Capital expenditures by major chipmakers and equipment suppliers continue to support long-term growth, while supply chain resilience and geopolitical tensions influence capital allocation. Regulatory developments around export controls and domestic manufacturing incentives shape the operating environment for companies in both ETFs. Broader macroeconomic factors, including interest rate trajectories and enterprise spending patterns, affect sector momentum across market cycles.
In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited elevated volatility consistent with the semiconductor industry's sensitivity to earnings reports from leading chip designers and manufacturers. CHPS broader holdings may moderate drawdowns during rotations away from mega-cap names, while SOXX concentrated structure can amplify gains when top constituents outperform. Relative positioning reflects differing approaches to capturing sector momentum, with CHPS offering incremental diversification benefits and SOXX delivering higher-beta exposure to established industry leaders. Liquidity profiles support institutional and retail participation in both vehicles.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking semiconductor exposure may find the tool useful for refining ETF or stock selections aligned with current market conditions.
Based on structural factors including lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings for diversification, and comparable thematic focus, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorability to CHPS for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and risk mitigation within semiconductor exposure. SOXX may appeal more to those seeking concentrated bets on top industry names despite the higher fee. This assessment reflects observable characteristics rather than forward-looking predictions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| CHPS | SOXX | CHPS / SOXX | |
| Gain YTD | 81.523 | 76.849 | 106% |
| Net Assets | 115M | 43.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.33 | 45% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 33.00 | 73% |
| Yield | 0.38 | 0.29 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 25 years | - |
| CHPS | SOXX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 75% | 18 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHPS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPS | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| LRCX - CHPS | 88% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| AMAT - CHPS | 85% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| KLAC - CHPS | 83% Closely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| MU - CHPS | 81% Closely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| NVMI - CHPS | 81% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXX has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXX jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOXX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOXX | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| LRCX - SOXX | 89% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| AMAT - SOXX | 87% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| KLAC - SOXX | 85% Closely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| ENTG - SOXX | 83% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| MPWR - SOXX | 82% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
More | ||||