It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHTR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLBTYA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHTR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBTYA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHTR (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -1.08% price change this week, while LBTYA (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.61%.
CHTR is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.
LBTYA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
CHTR | LBTYA | CHTR / LBTYA | |
Capitalization | 35.9B | 3.81B | 941% |
EBITDA | 21.4B | -1.84B | -1,166% |
Gain YTD | -23.244 | -12.853 | 181% |
P/E Ratio | 7.20 | 2.00 | 360% |
Revenue | 55.2B | 4.63B | 1,191% |
Total Cash | 606M | 3.15B | 19% |
Total Debt | 96.3B | 10.5B | 917% |
CHTR | LBTYA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LBTYA's Valuation (69) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as CHTR (79). This means that LBTYA’s stock grew similarly to CHTR’s over the last 12 months.
LBTYA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as CHTR (100). This means that LBTYA’s stock grew similarly to CHTR’s over the last 12 months.
CHTR's SMR Rating (26) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBTYA (96). This means that CHTR’s stock grew significantly faster than LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.
LBTYA's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as CHTR (65). This means that LBTYA’s stock grew similarly to CHTR’s over the last 12 months.
LBTYA's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as CHTR (90). This means that LBTYA’s stock grew similarly to CHTR’s over the last 12 months.
CHTR | LBTYA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago68% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago57% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 8 days ago58% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago69% | 20 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NITE | 32.56 | 0.47 | +1.47% |
The Nightview ETF | |||
CSQ | 18.49 | 0.15 | +0.82% |
Calamos Strategic Total Return | |||
SDHY | 16.87 | 0.05 | +0.30% |
PGIM Short Duration High Yield Opportunities Fund | |||
JULJ | 25.07 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Jul | |||
XOCT | 36.26 | N/A | N/A |
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Oct |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHTR has been closely correlated with LBRDK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHTR jumps, then LBRDK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CHTR | 100% | +1.67% | ||
LBRDK - CHTR | 82% Closely correlated | +1.85% | ||
LBRDA - CHTR | 75% Closely correlated | +1.72% | ||
CMCSA - CHTR | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
LBRDB - CHTR | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
LBTYA - CHTR | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBTYA has been closely correlated with LBTYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBTYA jumps, then LBTYK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBTYA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LBTYA | 100% | +1.46% | ||
LBTYK - LBTYA | 96% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
IDCC - LBTYA | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.74% | ||
KT - LBTYA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
S - LBTYA | 44% Loosely correlated | +3.10% | ||
CABO - LBTYA | 44% Loosely correlated | +9.57% | ||
More |