It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CIB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGGAL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CIB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGAL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CIB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.37% price change this week, while GGAL (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.
CIB is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
GGAL is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
CIB | GGAL | CIB / GGAL | |
Capitalization | 8.27B | 4.87B | 170% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 11.894 | 251.403 | 5% |
P/E Ratio | 5.22 | 58.02 | 9% |
Revenue | 28.51T | 693B | 4,114% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 32.09T | N/A | - |
CIB | GGAL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 92 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CIB's Valuation (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGAL (69). This means that CIB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGAL’s over the last 12 months.
GGAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIB (100). This means that GGAL’s stock grew significantly faster than CIB’s over the last 12 months.
GGAL's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIB (1). This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to CIB’s over the last 12 months.
GGAL's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIB (54). This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to CIB’s over the last 12 months.
GGAL's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIB (34). This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to CIB’s over the last 12 months.
CIB | GGAL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 5 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago66% | 7 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 7 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago81% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PFXF | 17.98 | 0.02 | +0.11% |
VanEck Pref Secs ex Fincls ETF | |||
JOJO | 14.45 | N/A | N/A |
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF | |||
LRGE | 75.58 | -1.39 | -1.80% |
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | |||
WLDR | 33.62 | -0.65 | -1.90% |
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | |||
FBY | 18.39 | -0.73 | -3.82% |
YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIB has been loosely correlated with PGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIB jumps, then PGC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CIB | 100% | +0.95% | ||
PGC - CIB | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
SBNY - CIB | 36% Loosely correlated | +3.13% | ||
EGBN - CIB | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
BSAC - CIB | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
GGAL - CIB | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.89% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGAL has been closely correlated with BMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGAL jumps, then BMA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GGAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GGAL | 100% | +2.89% | ||
BMA - GGAL | 90% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
BBAR - GGAL | 90% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
SUPV - GGAL | 87% Closely correlated | +2.31% | ||
SBNY - GGAL | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.13% | ||
TBNK - GGAL | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
More |