CIBR
Price
$85.33
Change
-$0.14 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Net Assets
13.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QTUM
Price
$161.30
Change
+$1.94 (+1.22%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Net Assets
6.02B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIBR vs QTUM

Header iconCIBR vs QTUM Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs QTUMBanner chart's image
CIBR vs QTUM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) vs. Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM)

Key Takeaways

  • CIBR offers targeted exposure to cybersecurity companies via the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, with 43 holdings dominated by top names like CRWD and PANW, while QTUM provides broader diversification across 86 holdings in quantum computing and machine learning through the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index.
  • QTUM features a lower expense ratio of 0.40% compared to CIBR's 0.58%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term holders.
  • CIBR's sector allocation is heavily tilted toward technology services (76%) and electronic technology (22%), reflecting pure cybersecurity focus, whereas QTUM spreads across technology (82-83%), industrials (10%), and communications for emerging tech exposure.
  • Both ETFs are passive and non-diversified thematically, but QTUM's modified equal-weighting promotes balance, contrasting CIBR's liquidity-weighted approach which concentrates in larger cybersecurity leaders.
  • In recent market cycles, QTUM has shown stronger momentum tied to AI and quantum hype, while CIBR provides more defensive positioning amid persistent cyber threats.
  • Structural liquidity is robust for both, with CIBR's larger scale supporting tighter spreads in volatile conditions.

Introduction

In today's rapidly evolving technology landscape, investors seek targeted exposure to high-growth themes like cybersecurity and quantum computing. CIBR and QTUM represent distinct yet complementary strategies within the broader tech sector ETF comparison. CIBR focuses on established cybersecurity firms addressing escalating digital threats, while QTUM captures the nascent potential of quantum and machine learning innovations. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer alternative exposure to transformative technologies, appealing to those balancing defensive sector exposure with speculative growth in the current market environment of AI acceleration and geopolitical risks. Comparing their structures reveals key differences in risk profiles, diversification, and positioning for sector rotation.

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) Overview

The First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is a passive ETF that tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, a liquidity-weighted benchmark of companies engaged in cybersecurity across technology and industrials sectors. Launched in 2015, it holds approximately 43 securities, providing concentrated exposure to the cybersecurity subsector.

Top holdings include CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, ~9%), PANW (Palo Alto Networks, ~9%), AVGO (Broadcom, ~9%), CSCO (Cisco Systems, ~8%), and FTNT (Fortinet, ~7-8%), comprising over 50% of assets. Sector allocation emphasizes technology services (76%), electronic technology (22%), and minor industrials, with primarily U.S.-listed firms.

Its expense ratio is 0.58%, and the fund rebalances quarterly to maintain alignment. CIBR's structure suits investors seeking defensive tech exposure, given cybersecurity's recession-resistant demand, with strong liquidity from substantial assets under management (AUM, assets under management).

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) Overview

The Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is a passive ETF tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index (BQTUM), a modified equal-weighted index targeting global companies deriving significant revenue from quantum computing, machine learning hardware, software, and related services. Inception in 2018, it maintains around 86 holdings for broad thematic coverage.

Leading holdings feature INTC (Intel, ~3%), MU (Micron Technology, ~2.8%), STMicroelectronics NV (STM, ~2.1%), NOK (Nokia, ~2.1%), and AMD (Advanced Micro Devices, ~1.9%), with top 10 at under 21% for balanced exposure. Sectors include technology (~83%), industrials (~10%), and communication services (~6%), spanning global firms.

Expense ratio stands at 0.40%, lower than peers, supporting cost-effective access to frontier tech. Quarterly rebalancing ensures relevance amid rapid innovation. QTUM's diversified structure positions it for high-growth potential in quantum and AI ecosystems.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Cybersecurity and quantum computing sit at the intersection of tech innovation and risk mitigation. Escalating cyber threats, fueled by AI-enabled attacks and geopolitical tensions, drive demand for robust defenses, with global spending projected to surge amid regulatory pushes like post-quantum cryptography standards. Meanwhile, quantum computing emerges as a disruptive force, promising breakthroughs in optimization, drug discovery, and encryption-breaking, though still nascent with commercial viability years away.

Capital flows favor AI-adjacent themes, but cybersecurity offers stability during volatility, while quantum faces hurdles like error rates and scalability. Macro drivers include interest rate sensitivity in tech capex and U.S.-China tech decoupling, heightening both sectors' relevance in diversified portfolios.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, QTUM has demonstrated superior relative positioning, benefiting from AI and quantum enthusiasm that propelled broader tech rallies, contrasting CIBR's steadier trajectory amid cybersecurity's consistent enterprise demand. Over recent market cycles, QTUM's higher beta reflects volatility from speculative holdings, while CIBR exhibits lower drawdowns tied to defensive top holdings' earnings resilience.

Performance divergences link to sector rotation toward growth proxies versus cybersecurity's staple-like qualities, influenced by interest rate expectations and cloud migration trends. QTUM's global diversification aids in upswings, but CIBR's U.S. focus and concentration enhance stability during corrections.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in sectors like cybersecurity and quantum tech.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors QTUM with moderate conviction, owing to its superior cost efficiency, broader diversification profile, and alignment with surging quantum and machine learning momentum in recent cycles. While CIBR excels in structural focus and defensive risk exposure, QTUM's lower fees and trend consistency position it probabilistically stronger for tech sector tailwinds, absent major cyber-specific catalysts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CIBR vs. QTUM commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and QTUM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 13B vs. QTUM (6.02B). QTUM has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: QTUM (47.389) vs CIBR (19.634). CIBR was incepted earlier than QTUM: CIBR (11 years) vs QTUM (8 years). QTUM (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.58). QTUM has a higher turnover CIBR (21.00) vs CIBR (21.00).
CIBRQTUMCIBR / QTUM
Gain YTD19.63447.38941%
Net Assets13B6.02B216%
Total Expense Ratio0.580.40145%
Turnover21.0042.0050%
Yield0.460.7363%
Fund Existence11 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIBRQTUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QTUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDIV28.080.24
+0.88%
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
WTV103.600.84
+0.82%
WisdomTree US Value ETF
EDGU31.640.21
+0.68%
3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF
FLUD24.97-0.04
-0.16%
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
SNAG5.83-0.16
-2.61%
Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF

QTUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTUM
1D Price
Change %
QTUM100%
+1.22%
LRCX - QTUM
78%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
AMAT - QTUM
73%
Closely correlated
+2.64%
MKSI - QTUM
73%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
KLAC - QTUM
73%
Closely correlated
+5.55%
TSM - QTUM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
More