CIBR
Price
$94.39
Change
+$0.38 (+0.40%)
Updated
Sep 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
15.33B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QTUM
Price
$147.84
Change
-$1.06 (-0.71%)
Updated
Sep 9, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.55B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIBR vs QTUM

CIBR vs QTUM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) vs. Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM)

Key Takeaways

  • First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) both offer passive, thematic exposure to high-growth technology segments but target distinct areas: cybersecurity infrastructure versus quantum computing and machine learning technologies.
  • CIBR tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index with approximately 44 holdings, resulting in higher concentration in established cybersecurity firms and a 0.58% expense ratio.
  • QTUM tracks the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index with roughly 80-87 holdings using a modified equal-weighted approach, providing broader diversification across quantum and artificial intelligence (AI)-adjacent companies at a lower 0.40% expense ratio.
  • Sector allocations overlap heavily in information technology but differ in emphasis, with CIBR featuring notable exposure to networking and software security while QTUM includes significant semiconductor and specialized hardware components.
  • Both ETFs are non-leveraged, open-ended structures suited for long-term thematic allocation rather than tactical trading, with QTUM offering potentially greater liquidity in certain market cycles due to its broader mandate.
  • Structural differences position CIBR for investors focused on digital defense themes and QTUM for those seeking exposure to next-generation computing innovations amid ongoing technological convergence.

Introduction

Investors seeking targeted technology exposure often compare specialized exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that address overlapping yet differentiated themes within the broader digital economy. First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) do not compete directly as substitutes; instead, they represent alternative strategies within the technology sector. CIBR emphasizes cybersecurity solutions critical to data protection and network integrity, while QTUM targets companies advancing quantum computing and machine learning capabilities. Both provide investors with efficient vehicles to access innovation-driven growth without individual stock selection, making them relevant for portfolios balancing sector exposure with thematic conviction in an environment of accelerating digital transformation.

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) Overview

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is a passively managed ETF that seeks to replicate the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. The index selects companies classified as cybersecurity providers by the Consumer Technology Association, focusing on firms involved in building, implementing, and managing security protocols for networks, computers, and devices. The fund typically holds around 44 securities and employs a liquidity-weighted methodology with caps on individual holdings to manage concentration. Top holdings commonly include Fortinet (FTNT), Palo Alto Networks (PANW), Cisco Systems (CSCO), CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD), and Broadcom (AVGO), with significant allocations to information technology software and equipment. The expense ratio stands at 0.58%. CIBR maintains a thematic focus with some spillover into industrials such as aerospace and defense, distinguishing it through its emphasis on established cybersecurity leaders rather than pure-play or emerging technologies.

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) Overview

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is a passively managed ETF designed to track the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. The index consists of a modified equal-weighted portfolio of companies deriving at least 50% of revenue or activity from quantum computing or machine learning development. QTUM holds approximately 80-87 securities, offering broader diversification across global markets with notable representation from semiconductors, software, and specialized hardware firms. Representative top holdings include companies such as Arqit Quantum, Horizon Quantum Holdings, Teradyne (TER), Micron Technology (MU), and Intel (INTC). The expense ratio is 0.40%. The fund’s structure emphasizes next-generation computing themes, with sector allocations concentrated in information technology alongside smaller positions in industrials and communication services, providing exposure to both pure quantum plays and established technology enablers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to experience robust capital allocation driven by persistent demand for digital infrastructure resilience and computational advancement. Cybersecurity remains a priority amid escalating threats to enterprise and government networks, supporting steady interest in specialized providers. Concurrently, quantum computing and machine learning represent frontier areas with potential applications in optimization, simulation, and artificial intelligence acceleration. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate trajectories and capital expenditure cycles influence both themes, while regulatory developments around data privacy and emerging technology standards add layers of complexity. Sector risks encompass rapid technological obsolescence, competitive intensity, and sensitivity to broader equity market sentiment during periods of economic uncertainty.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have demonstrated sensitivity to technology sector rotations and earnings momentum among leading holdings. First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has tended to exhibit steadier behavior tied to recurring cybersecurity spending patterns, with relative resilience during periods of heightened digital threat awareness. Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM), with its modified equal-weighted construction and exposure to semiconductors and quantum-related innovators, has shown greater responsiveness to advancements in artificial intelligence infrastructure and computing breakthroughs. Volatility differences arise from QTUM’s broader holdings base versus CIBR’s more concentrated cybersecurity focus, potentially leading to distinct responses to interest rate expectations and geopolitical developments affecting supply chains. Relative positioning favors each ETF depending on whether investors prioritize defensive technology themes or high-conviction growth in emerging computational paradigms.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into thematic ETFs like First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) may find the platform useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) currently presents a modestly stronger profile for Tickeron’s AI analysis due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across high-momentum quantum and machine learning exposures, and modified equal-weighted methodology that may better capture emerging trends. First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) offers compelling targeted exposure but carries a higher cost structure and greater concentration risk. This assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation of cost efficiency, thematic breadth, and positioning within evolving technology cycles rather than definitive outperformance expectations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CIBR vs. QTUM commentary
Sep 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and QTUM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 15.3B vs. QTUM (5.55B). QTUM has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: QTUM (36.293) vs CIBR (31.916). CIBR was incepted earlier than QTUM: CIBR (11 years) vs QTUM (8 years). QTUM (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.58). QTUM has a higher turnover CIBR (21.00) vs CIBR (21.00).
CIBRQTUMCIBR / QTUM
Gain YTD31.91636.29388%
Net Assets15.3B5.55B276%
Total Expense Ratio0.580.40145%
Turnover21.0042.0050%
Yield0.390.7949%
Fund Existence11 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIBRQTUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
CIBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QTUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLPX76.530.92
+1.22%
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
MUSE49.38N/A
N/A
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF
YBMN12.57N/A
N/A
Defiance Bmnr Option Income ETF
FITE107.83-0.18
-0.17%
Stt Strt® SPDR® S&PKenshoFutSecETF
BASG28.08-0.32
-1.14%
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF

QTUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTUM
1D Price
Change %
QTUM100%
+0.69%
LRCX - QTUM
82%
Closely correlated
+4.15%
MKSI - QTUM
78%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
LSCC - QTUM
78%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
AMAT - QTUM
78%
Closely correlated
+3.98%
KLAC - QTUM
76%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
More