CINF
Price
$182.81
Change
+$3.43 (+1.91%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
28.28B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KINS
Price
$19.91
Change
+$1.03 (+5.46%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
288.39M
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CINF vs KINS

CINF vs KINS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINF vs. KINS commentary
Jul 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINF is a Hold and KINS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2026
Stock price -- (CINF: $182.81 vs. KINS: $19.91)
Brand notoriety: CINF and KINS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINF: 44% vs. KINS: 52%
Market capitalization -- CINF: $28.28B vs. KINS: $288.39M
CINF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $28.28B. KINS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $288.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $139.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKINS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CINF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KINS is a better buy in the long-term than CINF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CINF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KINS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CINF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KINS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KINS is a better buy in the short-term than CINF.

Price Growth

CINF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.12% price change this week, while KINS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

CINF is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

KINS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.71% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CINF($28.3B) has a higher market cap than KINS($288M). CINF has higher P/E ratio than KINS: CINF (10.45) vs KINS (9.01). KINS YTD gains are higher at: 19.050 vs. CINF (13.211). KINS has less debt than CINF: KINS (4.12M) vs CINF (884M). CINF has higher revenues than KINS: CINF (12.9B) vs KINS (224M).
CINFKINSCINF / KINS
Capitalization28.3B288M9,826%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.21119.05069%
P/E Ratio10.459.01116%
Revenue12.9B224M5,759%
Total CashN/A157M-
Total Debt884M4.12M21,441%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINF vs KINS: Fundamental Ratings
CINF
KINS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2934
SMR RATING
1..100
5132
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8457
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CINF's Valuation (46) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

CINF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (34) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's SMR Rating (32) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CINF (51) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.

CINF's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CINF (84) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CINFKINS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CINF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KINS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THPMX16.980.10
+0.59%
Thompson MidCap
NMSAX24.05-0.01
-0.04%
Columbia Small Cap Index A
PNRZX84.85-0.58
-0.68%
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Z
FAEGX22.81-0.19
-0.83%
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth M
TLGAX14.45-0.18
-1.23%
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth A

CINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CINF has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CINF jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINF
1D Price
Change %
CINF100%
+1.91%
HIG - CINF
84%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
L - CINF
72%
Closely correlated
+1.96%
THG - CINF
69%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
CNA - CINF
67%
Closely correlated
+2.76%
AFG - CINF
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
More

KINS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KINS has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KINS jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KINS
1D Price
Change %
KINS100%
+5.46%
L - KINS
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
ACIC - KINS
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.90%
SAFT - KINS
39%
Loosely correlated
+41.49%
SKWD - KINS
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.09%
CINF - KINS
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
More