Advertisement
CJMB vs CRGO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CJMB is a Hold and CRGO is a Hold.
| CJMB | CRGO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CJMB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while CRGO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CJMB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CRGO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CJMB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRGO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CJMB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CRGO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CJMB (@Other Transportation) experienced а -3.64% price change this week, while CRGO (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was +4.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.48%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRGO is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Transportation (+4.39% weekly)Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.
@Packaged Software (+0.90% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
CJMB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CJMB has been loosely correlated with RLGT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CJMB jumps, then RLGT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CJMB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJMB | 100% | -10.67% | ||
| RLGT - CJMB | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| ATXG - CJMB | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.29% | ||
| CRGO - CJMB | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.36% | ||
| GXO - CJMB | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
| CYRX - CJMB | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||
CRGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRGO and PDFS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRGO and PDFS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRGO | 100% | -2.36% | ||
| PDFS - CRGO | 25% Poorly correlated | +3.70% | ||
| CJMB - CRGO | 24% Poorly correlated | -10.67% | ||
| DUOT - CRGO | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.61% | ||
| CDNS - CRGO | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.73% | ||
| XPER - CRGO | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
More | ||||