Advertisement
CRGO vs PDFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRGO is a Hold and PDFS is a Buy.
PDFS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRGO | PDFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 10 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 76% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRGO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PDFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRGO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PDFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRGO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PDFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRGO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PDFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRGO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.70% price change this week, while PDFS (@Packaged Software) price change was +15.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRGO is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2026.
PDFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.90% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BZQ | 18.98 | 0.55 | +2.97% |
| ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) | |||
| NVBT | 40.78 | -0.29 | -0.70% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT) | |||
| FNDB | 31.02 | -0.29 | -0.93% |
| Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) | |||
| FFOG | 51.72 | -0.59 | -1.14% |
| Franklin Focused Growth ETF | |||
| ACES | 28.71 | -0.69 | -2.35% |
| ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) | |||
CRGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRGO and PDFS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRGO and PDFS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRGO | 100% | -2.36% | ||
| PDFS - CRGO | 25% Poorly correlated | +3.70% | ||
| CJMB - CRGO | 24% Poorly correlated | -10.67% | ||
| DUOT - CRGO | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.61% | ||
| CDNS - CRGO | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.73% | ||
| XPER - CRGO | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
More | ||||