CLF
Price
$12.09
Change
-$0.20 (-1.63%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
6.9B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SID
Price
$1.33
Change
+$0.09 (+7.26%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.71B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLF vs SID

CLF vs SID Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. SID commentary
Sep 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a Buy and SID is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 10, 2026
Stock price -- (CLF: $12.09 vs. SID: $1.33)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. SID: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 49% vs. SID: 317%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $6.9B vs. SID: $1.71B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $6.9B. SID’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $1.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $58.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $10.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSID’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SID’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SID is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SID’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SID’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLF is a better buy in the short-term than SID.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а -2.66% price change this week, while SID (@Steel) price change was +13.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

SID is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (-3.00% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLF($6.9B) has a higher market cap than SID($1.71B). SID has higher P/E ratio than CLF: SID (898.88) vs CLF (145.67). CLF YTD gains are higher at: -8.961 vs. SID (-16.875). SID has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.02B vs. CLF (483M). SID has more cash in the bank: 14.3B vs. CLF (70M). CLF has less debt than SID: CLF (7.7B) vs SID (54.4B). SID has higher revenues than CLF: SID (45.1B) vs CLF (19.2B).
CLFSIDCLF / SID
Capitalization6.9B1.71B403%
EBITDA483M6.02B8%
Gain YTD-8.961-16.87553%
P/E Ratio145.67898.8816%
Revenue19.2B45.1B43%
Total Cash70M14.3B0%
Total Debt7.7B54.4B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs SID: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
SID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6744
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9495
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SID's Valuation (11) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (60). This means that SID’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

SID's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (100). This means that SID’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's SMR Rating (94) in the Steel industry is in the same range as SID (95). This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to SID’s over the last 12 months.

SID's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (46). This means that SID’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

SID's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (2). This means that SID’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFSID
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
CLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SID
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BALI34.34-0.15
-0.43%
iShares U.S. Large Cap Prm Inc Act ETF
FLCE31.60-0.15
-0.48%
Frontier Asset U.S. Large-Cap Equity ETF
CATF48.53-0.31
-0.64%
American Century California Muni Bd ETF
AFOS46.12-0.44
-0.95%
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
JOBX8.40-1.20
-12.50%
Tradr 2X Long JOBY Daily ETF

SID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SID has been loosely correlated with GGB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SID jumps, then GGB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SID
1D Price
Change %
SID100%
+7.26%
GGB - SID
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
TX - SID
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
MT - SID
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
CMC - SID
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
CLF - SID
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
More