CLLNY
Price
$17.44
Change
+$0.06 (+0.35%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
23.52B
50 days until earnings call
MMI
Price
$32.20
Change
+$0.32 (+1.00%)
Updated
Sep 18, 11:37 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.24B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLNY vs MMI

Header iconCLLNY vs MMI Comparison
Open Charts CLLNY vs MMIBanner chart's image
Cellnex Telecom SA
Price$17.44
Change+$0.06 (+0.35%)
Volume$80.48K
Capitalization23.52B
Marcus & Millichap
Price$32.20
Change+$0.32 (+1.00%)
Volume$137
Capitalization1.24B
CLLNY vs MMI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLLNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLNY vs. MMI commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLNY is a Buy and MMI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLNY: $17.44 vs. MMI: $31.89)
Brand notoriety: CLLNY and MMI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLNY: 107% vs. MMI: 98%
Market capitalization -- CLLNY: $23.52B vs. MMI: $1.24B
CLLNY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $23.52B. MMI’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLNY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLNY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMI is a better buy in the long-term than CLLNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLNY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MMI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLLNY is a better buy in the short-term than MMI.

Price Growth

CLLNY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -0.82% price change this week, while MMI (@Real Estate Development) price change was -0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLLNY is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

MMI is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.12% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLNY($23.5B) has a higher market cap than MMI($1.24B). CLLNY YTD gains are higher at: 11.926 vs. MMI (-15.395). CLLNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.15B vs. MMI (4.11M). CLLNY has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. MMI (75.1M). MMI has less debt than CLLNY: MMI (82.4M) vs CLLNY (21.9B). CLLNY has higher revenues than MMI: CLLNY (4.09B) vs MMI (726M).
CLLNYMMICLLNY / MMI
Capitalization23.5B1.24B1,895%
EBITDA3.15B4.11M76,513%
Gain YTD11.926-15.395-77%
P/E Ratio78.03N/A-
Revenue4.09B726M564%
Total Cash1.46B75.1M1,944%
Total Debt21.9B82.4M26,578%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLNY vs MMI: Fundamental Ratings
CLLNY
MMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
564
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10079
SMR RATING
1..100
9992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
552
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MMI's Valuation (28) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLLNY (99) in the null industry. This means that MMI’s stock grew significantly faster than CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

MMI's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CLLNY (100) in the null industry. This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

MMI's SMR Rating (92) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CLLNY (99) in the null industry. This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

MMI's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CLLNY (77) in the null industry. This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

MMI's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLNY (55) in the null industry. This means that MMI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLNYMMI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHY11.180.03
+0.22%
Calamos Convertible and High Income Fund
ERNZ22.650.02
+0.08%
TrueShares Active Yield ETF
JXI75.06-0.08
-0.10%
iShares Global Utilities ETF
SPLG77.56-0.10
-0.13%
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® ETF
QVOY28.01-0.09
-0.33%
Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF