Comparing MMI and NMRK offers investors a lens into two distinct approaches to the commercial real estate (CRE) brokerage and advisory industry. Marcus & Millichap, a firm rooted in private-client investment sales, and Newmark Group, a full-service institutional advisory powerhouse, both generate revenue primarily from CRE transaction activity — yet their scale, client mix, growth trajectories, and market valuations differ considerably. For traders and investors evaluating exposure to the real estate services sector, understanding how these two names compare across momentum, profitability, and risk can help inform positioning decisions. This article provides a data-driven, side-by-side assessment of both stocks in the current market environment.
MMI, Marcus & Millichap, Inc., is a Calabasas, California-based real estate services firm that specializes in commercial real estate investment sales, property financing, research, and advisory services. Founded in 1971, the company has built a dominant presence in the private-client and middle-market segments, connecting individual investors and smaller institutions with CRE opportunities across multifamily, retail, office, industrial, and other property types.
In recent months, MMI shares have traded in a range between roughly $24 and $34, reflecting a recovery narrative that has been gradual rather than explosive. The company reported full-year 2025 revenue of approximately $755 million, an 8.5% increase year-over-year, driven by gains in its Private Client Market brokerage segment and a notable 23% jump in financing fees. Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) surged 162.6% to $24.6 million, signaling improved operating leverage — though the company still posted a slight net loss of $1.9 million for the year, or $0.05 per share. On a positive note, Q4 2025 delivered net income of $13.3 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, reflecting a late-year acceleration in transaction closings.
The prevailing sentiment around MMI has been shaped by cautious optimism tied to an improving transaction environment, offset by lingering concerns about interest rates and the pace of recovery in middle-market and larger-transaction segments. With a market capitalization near $1.2 billion, a dividend yield around 1.6%, and a relatively modest beta of 1.34, MMI has attracted attention as a value-oriented play within the CRE brokerage space. However, the analyst community remains skeptical, with an average rating of "Underweight" and a consensus price target of approximately $28 — below recent trading levels.
NMRK, Newmark Group, Inc., is a New York-based commercial real estate advisory firm serving large institutional investors, global corporations, and other major owners and occupiers. Tracing its roots to 1929 and operating as a subsidiary of Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P., Newmark offers a comprehensive suite of services including investment sales, debt and structured finance, agency leasing, property and facilities management, valuation and advisory, and loan servicing. With a market capitalization of approximately $2.8 billion and roughly 8,800 employees worldwide, NMRK operates at a materially larger scale than MMI.
NMRK's recent performance has been characterized by strong top-line momentum. In its most recently reported quarter (Q3 2025), the company posted total revenues of $863.5 million, a 25.9% year-over-year increase, with double-digit gains across every major business line. Capital Markets revenues surged 59.7%, marking the eighth consecutive quarter in which NMRK outpaced the broader industry in this category. GAAP net income for the quarter reached $64 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, while Adjusted EPS (Earnings Per Share) came in at $0.42. Adjusted EBITDA grew 28.9% to $145.2 million. For the first nine months of 2025, total revenues exceeded $2.29 billion.
Despite this operational momentum, NMRK shares have experienced headwinds in 2026, declining roughly 11% year-to-date to trade near $15.89. This pullback has occurred alongside a higher-beta profile (1.68) and broader market uncertainty, even as the company's trailing-twelve-month return remains a healthy +15%. The stock pays a modest dividend yielding approximately 0.94%. Wall Street's view is considerably more favorable than MMI's: NMRK carries a consensus "Buy" rating from eight analysts with an average price target of $19.42, suggesting double-digit upside potential. The company's FY 2026 EPS estimate stands at approximately $1.93, supported by a robust transaction pipeline and expanding recurring revenue streams.
In an era where market-moving information travels at machine speed, traders are increasingly turning to AI-powered tools to help navigate complex stock comparisons like the one between MMI and NMRK. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots — selected from hundreds of available bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Only the strategies demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn placement in this section. These bots span a broad spectrum of trading styles, timeframes (from 5-minute to 60-minute intervals), and risk profiles, with some posting annualized returns exceeding 70% and win rates above 65% in recent reporting periods. Each bot operates on a distinct set of tickers, strategies, and technical indicators, giving users the flexibility to match an AI agent to their specific market thesis. To explore which AI strategies are currently leading the pack, visit the Trending AI Robots page and discover the bots best suited for today's market dynamics.
Business Model and Client Base: MMI and NMRK may both operate in commercial real estate services, but their target markets differ significantly. MMI is built around the private-client and middle-market segment, where individual investors and smaller institutions drive transaction flow. NMRK, by contrast, is oriented toward large institutional investors, global corporations, and high-profile transactions — its recent deal sheet includes a $4 billion AI data center joint venture and an $810 million Manhattan luxury condominium sale. This institutional tilt gives NMRK exposure to larger, lumpier transactions, while MMI's private-client focus provides a more granular, diversified revenue base.
Scale and Financials: NMRK is the larger entity by a wide margin. With trailing twelve-month revenues approaching $3.2 billion, it is more than four times the size of MMI ($755 million in FY 2025). NMRK is also solidly profitable on a GAAP basis, generating substantial net income and free cash flow, whereas MMI is still working its way back to sustained profitability after the CRE transaction downturn. NMRK's Adjusted EBITDA margin of approximately 15-17% compares favorably to MMI's single-digit margins.
Growth and Momentum: NMRK has demonstrated stronger recent revenue growth, with quarterly gains exceeding 25% year-over-year, driven by surging capital markets activity and expansion into recurring revenue businesses like management services and loan servicing. MMI's growth has been more measured, with full-year revenue up 8.5%, reflecting a slower recovery trajectory in the private-client segment.
Risk Factors: Both companies are cyclical and sensitive to CRE transaction volumes, interest rate changes, and the broader economic backdrop. MMI's smaller scale and near-break-even profitability introduce higher earnings volatility and limited margin for error during downturns. NMRK's larger, more diversified platform — including recurring servicing and management fees — provides a degree of revenue stability, though its higher beta and institutional concentration may amplify drawdowns during risk-off episodes.
Market Sentiment: The divergence in analyst sentiment is striking. NMRK's "Buy" consensus with meaningful upside to target price reflects confidence in its earnings trajectory and sector leadership. MMI's "Underweight" rating and below-market target suggest skepticism about the pace and durability of its recovery.
Based on observable market factors — including trend consistency, revenue momentum, profitability profile, and relative analyst sentiment — Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor NMRK over MMI in the current environment. NMRK's consistent double-digit revenue growth, expanding margins, profitable GAAP earnings, and favorable analyst consensus create a stronger foundational profile. While MMI's lower beta and recent year-to-date price resilience may appeal to more defensive-minded traders, the combination of stronger institutional-grade catalysts and broader business diversification tilts the probabilistic edge toward NMRK. That said, no AI model can guarantee outcomes, and relative positioning can shift rapidly with changes in interest rate expectations, CRE transaction volumes, and macroeconomic conditions. Traders should evaluate both stocks within the context of their individual strategy, risk tolerance, and market outlook.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MMI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMRK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MMI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMRK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MMI (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.78% price change this week, while NMRK (@Real Estate Development) price change was -4.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.66%.
MMI is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
NMRK is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| MMI | NMRK | MMI / NMRK | |
| Capitalization | 1.18B | 2.68B | 44% |
| EBITDA | 27.2M | 460M | 6% |
| Gain YTD | 15.211 | -14.022 | -108% |
| P/E Ratio | 84.16 | 18.52 | 454% |
| Revenue | 782M | 3.48B | 23% |
| Total Cash | 187M | 212M | 88% |
| Total Debt | 75M | 2.46B | 3% |
MMI | NMRK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 24 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NMRK's Valuation (13) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMI (85). This means that NMRK’s stock grew significantly faster than MMI’s over the last 12 months.
NMRK's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MMI (100). This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to MMI’s over the last 12 months.
NMRK's SMR Rating (72) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MMI (91). This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to MMI’s over the last 12 months.
MMI's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (71). This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
MMI's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMRK (96). This means that MMI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
| MMI | NMRK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 64% | 9 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 69% | 6 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NVDX | 20.59 | 1.17 | +6.02% |
| T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | |||
| AVEE | 68.64 | 0.63 | +0.93% |
| Avantis Emerging Markets Sm Cp Eq ETF | |||
| ABLS | 23.07 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
| Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF | |||
| HIMU | 48.63 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
| iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF | |||
| CPST | 28.02 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Sep | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMI has been loosely correlated with CWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMI jumps, then CWK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MMI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMI | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| CWK - MMI | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| CBRE - MMI | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| NMRK - MMI | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| JLL - MMI | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| FRPH - MMI | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||