Advertisement
JLL vs MMI
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) vs. Marcus & Millichap (MMI) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- JLL has outperformed MMI in recent market activity, gaining approximately 15% over the past month compared to MMI's 8-9% rise.
- JLL's one-year return stands at over 50%, significantly ahead of MMI's negative performance of around -7%.
- Both companies operate in commercial real estate services, but JLL offers broader global services including investment management with $86 billion in assets under management (AUM).
- JLL boasts a larger market capitalization of about $15.7 billion versus MMI's roughly $1 billion.
- Recent quarterly earnings beats for both, though JLL shows stronger growth trajectory and analyst buy ratings.
- Real estate sector recovery influences sentiment, with JLL demonstrating greater stability amid volatility.
Introduction
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Marcus & Millichap (MMI) are key players in the commercial real estate services sector, providing brokerage, leasing, and investment management amid evolving market dynamics. This comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and relative positioning to assist traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors evaluating sector exposure. With real estate markets showing signs of stabilization, understanding contrasts in scale, diversification, and momentum helps inform portfolio decisions in a cyclical industry.
JLL Overview and Recent Performance
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is a leading global professional services firm specializing in commercial real estate and investment management. Its operations span leasing, capital markets, property management, and LaSalle Investment Management, overseeing over $86 billion in AUM across public and private strategies. In recent weeks, JLL stock has exhibited strong upward momentum, rising about 15% over the past month and over 50% in the last year. This performance follows a Q4 2025 earnings beat, with revenue up 3.78% and EPS (earnings per share) surpassing estimates by 20%. Sentiment has been bolstered by analyst upgrades and positive growth outlook in recovering real estate transaction volumes, though short-term volatility persists due to interest rate sensitivity.
MMI Overview and Recent Performance
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (MMI) focuses on commercial real estate investment brokerage, financing, and services primarily for private clients in the U.S. market. The firm emphasizes middle-market transactions across retail, office, and multifamily properties. Recently, MMI shares have climbed around 8% in the past month, reflecting modest recovery, though year-to-date and one-year returns lag at low single digits negative. Q4 CY2025 results showed revenue growth of 1.6% beating estimates by 6.3%, with EPS up 57% year-over-year, supported by brokerage and financing gains. Performance has been influenced by improving transaction activity, offset by broader sector headwinds and valuation concerns.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top-performing AI trading bots curated from hundreds available on the platform—specifically, 25 selected out of 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers. These bots employ diverse strategies, including short-term scalping, swing trading, and long-term trend following, with varying timeframes from intraday to multi-month holds. Performance metrics often feature win rates above 60%, average returns ranging from 20-100% annually for top performers, and risk-adjusted statistics like Sharpe ratios exceeding 1.5. Tailored to current market conditions, they adapt to volatility in sectors like real estate. Traders can explore these for automated insights; visit the page to evaluate bots potentially suitable for JLL or MMI exposure.
Head-to-Head Comparison
JLL and MMI both serve commercial real estate but differ in scale and scope: JLL's diversified global model includes full-service advisory and investment management, contrasting MMI's U.S.-centric brokerage focus. Growth drivers favor JLL with stronger revenue momentum and international exposure, while MMI benefits from niche private client deals. Recent momentum tilts to JLL's 15% monthly gain versus MMI's 8%, reflecting better trend consistency. Risk factors are similar—interest rates and transaction volumes—but JLL's larger size offers relative stability. Sector exposure is aligned in CRE recovery, yet market sentiment leans positive for JLL amid analyst targets around $385.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor JLL over MMI, based on superior trend consistency, higher relative performance in recent months, and positive catalysts like earnings beats and diversified positioning. While MMI shows recovery signs, JLL's stability and momentum suggest greater probabilistic upside in prevailing conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLL is a Hold and MMI is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JLL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- JLL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MMI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JLL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- JLL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
- MMI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
JLL (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.43% price change this week, while MMI (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
JLL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
MMI is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (-0.26% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| JLL | MMI | JLL / MMI | |
| Capitalization | 13.9B | 1.14B | 1,218% |
| EBITDA | 1.48B | 27.2M | 5,449% |
| Gain YTD | -10.854 | 11.585 | -94% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.14 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 26.8B | 782M | 3,427% |
| Total Cash | 436M | 187M | 233% |
| Total Debt | 3.98B | 75M | 5,301% |
JLL | MMI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MMI's Valuation (78) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JLL (86). This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMI (100). This means that JLL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMI’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's SMR Rating (72) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MMI (92). This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to MMI’s over the last 12 months.
MMI's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JLL (57). This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.
MMI's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for JLL (78). This means that MMI’s stock grew significantly faster than JLL’s over the last 12 months.
| JLL | MMI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 65% | 10 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 58% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SEUIX | 29.33 | 0.26 | +0.89% |
| SEI Large Cap Value I (SIMT) | |||
| FMGIX | 14.15 | 0.11 | +0.78% |
| MFG Core Infrastructure Institutional | |||
| FUNFX | 103.20 | 0.55 | +0.54% |
| American Fds Fundamental Invs F-3 | |||
| FSRFX | 122.56 | 0.65 | +0.53% |
| Fidelity Select Transportation | |||
| BALPX | 10.06 | 0.01 | +0.10% |
| BlackRock Event Driven Equity Inv A | |||
JLL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JLL has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JLL jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JLL | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| CBRE - JLL | 89% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| CWK - JLL | 82% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| NMRK - JLL | 82% Closely correlated | +2.50% | ||
| CIGI - JLL | 69% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| MMI - JLL | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||