Advertisement
CLMT vs FUL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLMT is a Hold and FUL is a Hold.
CLMT in upward trend: price may jump up because it broke its lower Bollinger Band on November 06, 2026
CLMT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 35 of 39 cases where CLMT's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 5 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 15 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +3.85% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CLMT advanced for three days, in 263 of 326 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 19, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CLMT as a result. In 53 of 75 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CLMT turned negative on October 19, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 31 of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 74%.
CLMT moved below its 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for CLMT crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 15 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CLMT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
The Aroon Indicator for CLMT entered a downward trend on November 11, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 9 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (-3.064) is normal, around the industry mean (2.284). P/E Ratio (-25.740) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-17.137). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.070) is also within normal values, averaging (1.548). Dividend Yield (0.069) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.100) is also within normal values, averaging (48.960).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 32 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 84, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. CLMT’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
FUL in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026
FUL moved above its 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 43 of 65 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 06, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FUL as a result. In 52 of 84 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
The 10-day moving average for FUL crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 11, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 14 of 22 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Following a +3.76% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FUL advanced for three days, in 149 of 279 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 53%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 35 of 56 cases where FUL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FUL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
FUL broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. FUL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 61 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.289) is normal, around the industry mean (2.284). P/E Ratio (14.665) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-17.137). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.840) is also within normal values, averaging (1.548). Dividend Yield (0.020) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.801) is also within normal values, averaging (48.960).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FUL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 84, placing this stock worse than average.
CLMT | FUL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLMT's Valuation (9) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (61). This means that CLMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
CLMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (100). This means that CLMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's SMR Rating (73) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CLMT (100). This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to CLMT’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CLMT (62). This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to CLMT’s over the last 12 months.
CLMT's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (89). This means that CLMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
| CLMT | FUL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 81% | 10 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLMT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while FUL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLMT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLMT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- FUL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CLMT (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -17.68% price change this week, while FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -3.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLMT is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2027.
FUL is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-3.14% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
Advertisement
CLMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLMT and FUL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLMT and FUL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLMT | 100% | +2.81% | ||
| FUL - CLMT | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| AXTA - CLMT | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| RPM - CLMT | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| SNES - CLMT | 25% Poorly correlated | -13.34% | ||
| SCL - CLMT | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
More | ||||
FUL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUL | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| RPM - FUL | 73% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| PPG - FUL | 70% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| OLN - FUL | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| AVNT - FUL | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| ASIX - FUL | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JPEM | 63.08 | 0.24 | +0.38% |
| JPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) | |||
| IBMX | 24.84 | 0.06 | +0.26% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMX) | |||
| TISC | 23.10 | 0.06 | +0.26% |
| Thrivent International Small Cap ETF (TISC) | |||
| ALLW | 28.81 | 0.06 | +0.21% |
| State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) | |||
| BZZ | 20.58 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| Corgi Drones & Urban Air Mobility ETF (BZZ) | |||