FUL saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 13, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 83 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 54 of the 83 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 65%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FUL's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 16 of 27 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FUL just turned positive on September 25, 2026. Looking at past instances where FUL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 26 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
Following a +0.63% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FUL advanced for three days, in 153 of 283 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 32 of 57 cases where FUL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FUL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
FUL broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for FUL entered a downward trend on October 05, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 61 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.282) is normal, around the industry mean (2.372). P/E Ratio (14.591) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-17.543). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.840) is also within normal values, averaging (1.548). Dividend Yield (0.020) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.801) is also within normal values, averaging (48.960).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. FUL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FUL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock worse than average.
The RSI Oscillator for OLN moved out of oversold territory on October 14, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 37 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 26 of the 37 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 70%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 36 of 55 cases where OLN's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 23, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on OLN as a result. In 47 of 75 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for OLN just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where OLN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Following a +4.89% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where OLN advanced for three days, in 181 of 274 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
OLN may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where OLN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
The Aroon Indicator for OLN entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 40 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.043) is normal, around the industry mean (1.155). P/E Ratio (-9.052) is within average values for comparable stocks, (3.120). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.050) is also within normal values, averaging (3.769). Dividend Yield (0.051) settles around the average of (0.135) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.289) is also within normal values, averaging (0.578).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 79 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. OLN’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. OLN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock worse than average.
FUL | OLN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OLN's Valuation (40) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FUL (61). This means that OLN’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
OLN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FUL (100). This means that OLN’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's SMR Rating (73) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as OLN (94). This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to OLN’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's Price Growth Rating (71) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as OLN (79). This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to OLN’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as OLN (97). This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to OLN’s over the last 12 months.
| FUL | OLN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 75% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while OLN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -3.33% price change this week, while OLN (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.75%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -25.95%.
FUL is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2027.
OLN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-1.35% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SWZ | 5.85 | 0.04 | +0.69% |
| Total Return Securities Inc | |||
| QQMY | 26.04 | 0.09 | +0.33% |
| Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF (QQMY) | |||
| PMBS | 47.02 | -0.10 | -0.22% |
| PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) | |||
| BAVA | 24.61 | -0.22 | -0.89% |
| Bitwise Avalanche ETF (BAVA) | |||
| BUSA | 41.69 | -0.50 | -1.19% |
| Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUL | 100% | -2.52% | ||
| RPM - FUL | 72% Closely correlated | -2.93% | ||
| PPG - FUL | 68% Closely correlated | -2.19% | ||
| OLN - FUL | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| ASIX - FUL | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| AVNT - FUL | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLN has been closely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OLN jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.