Advertisement
CLMT vs RPM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLMT is a Buy and RPM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLMT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRPM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RPM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLMT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RPM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RPM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CLMT (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +6.00% price change this week, while RPM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLMT is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.
RPM is expected to report earnings on Oct 07, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.32% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| CLMT | RPM | CLMT / RPM | |
| Capitalization | 3.85B | 13.7B | 28% |
| EBITDA | 50.6M | 1.2B | 4% |
| Gain YTD | 122.396 | 4.531 | 2,701% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.07 | 20.71 | 131% |
| Revenue | 4.17B | 7.86B | 53% |
| Total Cash | 139M | 315M | 44% |
| Total Debt | 2.33B | 2.88B | 81% |
CLMT | RPM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RPM's Valuation (34) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CLMT (50). This means that RPM’s stock grew similarly to CLMT’s over the last 12 months.
CLMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RPM (66). This means that CLMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RPM’s over the last 12 months.
RPM's SMR Rating (45) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLMT (100). This means that RPM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLMT’s over the last 12 months.
CLMT's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as RPM (56). This means that CLMT’s stock grew similarly to RPM’s over the last 12 months.
RPM's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CLMT (58). This means that RPM’s stock grew similarly to CLMT’s over the last 12 months.
| CLMT | RPM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 47% |
Advertisement
CLMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLMT has been loosely correlated with GEVO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLMT jumps, then GEVO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLMT | 100% | +1.01% | ||
| GEVO - CLMT | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.27% | ||
| FUL - CLMT | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| AXTA - CLMT | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
| RPM - CLMT | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
| LYB - CLMT | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.71% | ||
More | ||||
RPM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RPM has been closely correlated with PPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RPM jumps, then PPG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RPM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPM | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| PPG - RPM | 81% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| SHW - RPM | 75% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| FUL - RPM | 75% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| AVNT - RPM | 70% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| AXTA - RPM | 70% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||