CLSK
Price
$13.31
Change
-$0.03 (-0.22%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
3.43B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SNOW
Price
$330.31
Change
+$2.19 (+0.67%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
115.76B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs SNOW

CLSK vs SNOW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. Snowflake (SNOW) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CLSK is a Bitcoin miner pivoting toward AI data-center hosting, a transition that adds execution and leverage risk alongside a large contracted-revenue opportunity.
  • SNOW is a cloud data-platform leader whose product revenue growth has re-accelerated, supported by rising AI-driven consumption.
  • SNOW's business is more diversified and less volatile, while CLSK carries a much higher beta and is more sensitive to Bitcoin prices and project-financing outcomes.
  • Both names have AI exposure, but CLSK's is infrastructure-led and SNOW's is software- and data-led, creating very different risk profiles.
  • Recent momentum favors SNOW, which has climbed sharply on strong earnings, while CLSK has been more range-bound amid its strategic pivot.

Introduction

Investors evaluating AI-adjacent equities often encounter two very different kinds of stories. CLSK represents a capital-intensive pivot from cryptocurrency mining into digital infrastructure, while SNOW represents an established software platform monetizing enterprise data and AI workloads. This stock comparison examines relative performance, business models, growth drivers, and market positioning to help traders and long-term investors understand the trade-offs between a high-volatility infrastructure play and a large-cap, growth-oriented software franchise. The two tickers rarely compete directly, yet both are frequently grouped under the broader artificial-intelligence theme, making their contrasting risk and reward profiles a useful case study.

CLSK Overview and Recent Performance

CleanSpark (CLSK) is a U.S.-based Bitcoin mining company that has announced a strategic shift toward high-performance computing and AI data-center hosting. In recent weeks, the market has focused on the company's 20-year lease for its Sandersville, Georgia campus with a high-investment-grade technology tenant, a contract expected to generate roughly $6.6 billion in base revenue, with potential upside to about $11.6 billion if extension options are exercised. To fund the build-out, CleanSpark raised approximately $2.28 billion in senior secured notes.

That financing has drawn attention to near-term pressure. Recent quarterly results showed mining revenue declining sharply alongside lower Bitcoin prices, and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) turned negative. The stock trades with a beta well above the broader market, reflecting elevated volatility and meaningful short interest. Sentiment is split between the long-duration, contracted cash flows of the data-center pivot and the execution risk of a balance sheet carrying new debt while the mining segment remains tied to cryptocurrency prices.

SNOW Overview and Recent Performance

Snowflake (SNOW) is a cloud-native data platform that enables organizations to store, govern, and analyze data across public clouds while building AI applications. In its most recent quarter, product revenue grew roughly 37% year over year, marking consecutive quarters of acceleration. The company reported about 828 customers generating more than $1 million in trailing product revenue and a net revenue retention rate of 126%, indicating that existing customers are expanding their spending.

Snowflake has also highlighted rapid adoption of its first-party AI tools, with account counts climbing quickly, and management raised its full-year product revenue outlook. A multi-year cloud infrastructure commitment to Amazon Web Services (AWS) has been interpreted by investors as a sign of expected workload growth. The stock responded with a sharp rally and now trades near the upper end of its 52-week range, at a price-to-sales multiple that reflects strong growth expectations but leaves limited room for disappointing execution.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that monitor thousands of tickers across different strategies, timeframes, and risk profiles. Because market conditions change constantly, only a small subset of these bots are well suited to the current environment, and those are the ones featured in the curated Trending AI Robots section. The bots on this page vary widely in trading style, holding period, performance statistics, and the sets of tickers they trade, giving traders the ability to filter for approaches that match their own objectives. For investors tracking names such as CLSK and SNOW, the section offers a way to observe how automated, data-driven strategies are currently positioning across the market. You can explore the current lineup by visiting the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The two companies occupy opposite ends of the AI value chain. CLSK supplies physical capacity — power and data-center infrastructure — a business that is capital-intensive, cyclical, and sensitive to financing costs, energy access, and cryptocurrency prices. Its growth driver is the contracted monetization of its power portfolio, but that revenue is largely future-dated and contingent on project completion. SNOW, by contrast, generates recurring, consumption-based software revenue, with growth driven by data migration and AI workload expansion rather than physical construction.

Risk profiles differ substantially. CLSK carries a much higher beta, substantial short interest, and new leverage tied to its data-center build-out, which can produce large price swings in either direction. SNOW faces execution and valuation risks of its own — including intense competition in the data-platform market and a premium multiple — but its volatility and balance-sheet profile are comparatively more stable. In terms of recent momentum, SNOW has trended upward on accelerating growth, while CLSK's relative performance has been more uneven as investors weigh near-term losses against longer-term contracted revenue.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor SNOW in the current environment. The company exhibits more consistent trend momentum, accelerating revenue growth, and improving operating margins, with clearer near-term catalysts tied to AI product adoption. CLSK presents a higher-uncertainty profile, given its dependence on a multi-year build-out, new debt, and ongoing mining losses. While CLSK's contracted data-center revenue could improve its positioning once cash flows begin, the present balance of trend consistency and stability appears to favor SNOW. This assessment is probabilistic and reflects current conditions rather than a definitive prediction of future returns.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CLSK vs. SNOW commentary
Sep 30, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a StrongBuy and SNOW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK vs SNOW: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
SNOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2470
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10093
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9033

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLSK's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as SNOW (93) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to SNOW’s over the last 12 months.

SNOW's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (100) in the null industry. This means that SNOW’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

SNOW's SMR Rating (98) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (98) in the null industry. This means that SNOW’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

SNOW's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (40) in the null industry. This means that SNOW’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as SNOW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to SNOW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKSNOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2026
Stock price -- (CLSK: $13.31 vs. SNOW: $330.31)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and SNOW are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while SNOW is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 64% vs. SNOW: 111%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $3.43B vs. SNOW: $115.76B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.43B. SNOW’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $115.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $590 to $304.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $39 to $244.09B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.69B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SNOW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLSK and SNOW are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNOW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SNOW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNOW is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -12.09% price change this week, while SNOW (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -6.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.93%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2026.

SNOW is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-6.92% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Packaged Software (-4.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SNOW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYI9.850.02
+0.20%
Western Asset High Yield Opportunity Fund Inc
BBH245.640.30
+0.12%
VanEck Biotech ETF (BBH)
DVXK35.88N/A
N/A
Webs Defined Volatility Xlk ETF
TYA10.99-0.01
-0.09%
Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA)
ESML52.28-0.15
-0.29%
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML)

SNOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNOW has been closely correlated with MDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNOW jumps, then MDB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNOW
1D Price
Change %
SNOW100%
+0.67%
MDB - SNOW
67%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
COIN - SNOW
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
NET - SNOW
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
CLSK - SNOW
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
ESTC - SNOW
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
More