Advertisement
CLSK vs XP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. XP Inc. (XP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CLSK (CleanSpark) operates in Bitcoin mining and has reported a fiscal Q3 2026 net loss amid revenue declines, while showing operational Bitcoin production updates in recent weeks.
- XP (XP Inc.) provides financial services primarily in Brazil and maintains client asset growth, with shares trading near $15.80–$15.84 and upcoming Q2 2026 earnings.
- Year-to-date performance shows CLSK returning approximately 19.5% compared to roughly 2% for XP, against a broader S&P 500 gain of about 14%.
- CLSK exhibits higher volatility tied to cryptocurrency prices and expansion into AI infrastructure, whereas XP reflects steadier but more modest movements in the financial services sector.
- Sector exposure differs sharply: CLSK is sensitive to energy costs, Bitcoin halving effects, and digital asset sentiment; XP benefits from regional economic conditions and client inflows in Latin American markets.
- Recent market activity indicates CLSK reacting to earnings and operational metrics, while XP awaits earnings with limited price momentum in recent weeks.
Introduction
This comparison examines CLSK and XP to highlight differences in business models, recent performance, and market positioning. The analysis focuses on observable factors such as revenue trends, sector dynamics, and relative returns that may interest traders monitoring volatility in cryptocurrency-related equities alongside stability in financial services platforms. Both stocks trade on major U.S. exchanges and appeal to investors seeking exposure to distinct economic themes without overlapping operations.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark, Inc. engages in Bitcoin mining operations and has expanded into high-performance computing infrastructure. In recent weeks, the company released operational updates detailing monthly Bitcoin production and fleet metrics. Fiscal third-quarter 2026 results showed revenue of $138 million, a decline of approximately 30% year-over-year, alongside a net loss of $239.84 million compared with prior-year profit. The stock has traded near $12 in recent market activity, posting a year-to-date return of about 19.5%. Sentiment has been influenced by Bitcoin price movements, energy costs, and announcements regarding data center initiatives, contributing to price fluctuations amid broader cryptocurrency market conditions.
XP Overview and Recent Performance
XP Inc. operates as a financial technology platform offering investment and brokerage services primarily across Latin America. The firm has reported steady growth in client assets, with recent figures reflecting continued expansion in assets under management. Shares have traded in the $15.80–$15.84 range during recent market activity, delivering a year-to-date return of approximately 2%. Performance has been shaped by regional economic factors, interest rate environments, and client inflows. The company is scheduled to release second-quarter 2026 results in mid-August, with prior periods showing resilience in revenue generation despite periodic market volatility in emerging-market financial services.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions, consistent strategies, and favorable statistics earn placement in this section. Available bots span varied trading styles, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with historical win rates and risk parameters differing by strategy. Traders can review detailed statistics to identify bots aligned with specific risk tolerances and market views. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional options.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models contrast sharply: CLSK focuses on energy-intensive Bitcoin production with ancillary AI infrastructure pursuits, while XP centers on fee-based financial services and client asset gathering. Growth drivers for CLSK include Bitcoin network dynamics and operational efficiency, whereas XP relies on regional wealth accumulation and product expansion. Recent momentum favors CLSK on a year-to-date basis, though both face sector-specific risks—cryptocurrency price swings and regulatory considerations for CLSK, versus currency and macroeconomic exposure for XP. Market sentiment reflects higher beta in CLSK relative to the more defensive profile of XP within diversified portfolios.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as relative year-to-date returns, trend consistency in operational updates, and positioning within respective sectors, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term characteristics to CLSK over XP. This assessment incorporates recent performance differentials and catalyst visibility, though outcomes remain subject to broader market variables and sector rotations.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and XP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- XP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XP’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- XP’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.91% price change this week, while XP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +6.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +9.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2026.
XP is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+9.67% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| CLSK | XP | CLSK / XP | |
| Capitalization | 3.08B | 8.53B | 36% |
| EBITDA | -69.3M | 6.08B | -1% |
| Gain YTD | 18.379 | 4.018 | 457% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 8.59 | 86% |
| Revenue | 740M | 8.25B | 9% |
| Total Cash | 935M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | N/A | - |
CLSK | XP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as XP (82). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to XP’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as XP (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to XP’s over the last 12 months.
XP's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (98). This means that XP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
XP's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (62). This means that XP’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
XP's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (87). This means that XP’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | XP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 12 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSUS | 105.83 | 0.52 | +0.49% |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US Equity ETF | |||
| FLCV | 37.71 | 0.17 | +0.44% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| MUNY | 101.72 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| Vanguard New York Tx-Exm Bd ETF | |||
| LLDR | 43.22 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | |||
| CBOL | 23.72 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos Laddered Bitcoin Str Alt Prt ETF | |||
CLSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSK | 100% | -4.92% | ||
| MARA - CLSK | 83% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| RIOT - CLSK | 80% Closely correlated | -5.48% | ||
| BTBT - CLSK | 77% Closely correlated | -4.08% | ||
| KEEL - CLSK | 76% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| MSTR - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | +6.10% | ||
More | ||||
XP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XP has been loosely correlated with IBKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XP jumps, then IBKR could also see price increases.