CMA
Price
$66.02
Change
-$0.48 (-0.72%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.17B
71 days until earnings call
FHN
Price
$21.16
Change
-$0.25 (-1.17%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.55B
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMA vs FHN

Header iconCMA vs FHN Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs FHNBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$66.02
Change-$0.48 (-0.72%)
Volume$5.82K
Capitalization7.17B
First Horizon
Price$21.16
Change-$0.25 (-1.17%)
Volume$41.83K
Capitalization8.55B
CMA vs FHN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMA vs. FHN commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a Hold and FHN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CMA: $66.01 vs. FHN: $21.41)
Brand notoriety: CMA and FHN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 58% vs. FHN: 124%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $7.17B vs. FHN: $8.55B
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.17B. FHN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFHN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FHN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHN is a better buy in the long-term than CMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FHN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHN is a better buy in the short-term than CMA.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.31% price change this week, while FHN (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

FHN is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHN($8.55B) has a higher market cap than CMA($7.17B). FHN has higher P/E ratio than CMA: FHN (9.71) vs CMA (8.40). CMA YTD gains are higher at: 9.422 vs. FHN (7.995). CMA has more cash in the bank: 1.44B vs. FHN (1.01B). FHN has less debt than CMA: FHN (1.48B) vs CMA (9.77B). CMA has higher revenues than FHN: CMA (3.59B) vs FHN (3.16B).
CMAFHNCMA / FHN
Capitalization7.17B8.55B84%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.4227.995118%
P/E Ratio8.409.7186%
Revenue3.59B3.16B114%
Total Cash1.44B1.01B143%
Total Debt9.77B1.48B662%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs FHN: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
FHN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8383
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5542
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3729
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FHN's Valuation (74) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (82) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

FHN's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (55) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

FHN's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (9) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FHN (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to FHN’s over the last 12 months.

FHN's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (37) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMAFHN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AICCX63.170.35
+0.56%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer C
IIIIX12.90N/A
N/A
Voya International Index Port I
GCTCX44.49N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq C
HEOMX18.06N/A
N/A
Hartford Climate Opportunities A
SGIGX33.41N/A
N/A
Steward Global Equity Income Fund R6