The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
| CMDT | COMB | CMDT / COMB | |
| Gain YTD | 28.311 | 32.591 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 878M | 159M | 552% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.25 | 260% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Yield | 2.43 | 6.88 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 9 years | - |
| CMDT | COMB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 13 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CMDT and PWR have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMDT and PWR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMDT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMDT | 100% | N/A | ||
| PWR - CMDT | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
| MDLZ - CMDT | -0% Poorly correlated | -0.28% |