CMG
Price
$31.80
Change
-$0.20 (-0.62%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
41.06B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRSH
Price
$10.27
Change
+$0.50 (+5.12%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.7B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMG vs FRSH

CMG vs FRSH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) vs. Freshworks (FRSH) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) is a dominant fast-casual restaurant chain with over $11.9 billion in annual revenue, but it faces slowing same-store sales and compressing margins after years of rapid expansion.
  • Freshworks (FRSH) is a smaller, growth-stage SaaS (Software as a Service) company that achieved its first full year of profitability in 2025, though recent quarterly results have returned to modest net losses.
  • Both stocks have experienced significant drawdowns over the past twelve months — CMG down roughly 36% and FRSH down roughly 23% — reflecting sector-specific headwinds.
  • CMG offers a mature, cash-generative business with a P/E (Price-to-Earnings) ratio near 31, while FRSH trades at a lower market capitalization with stronger revenue growth rates but less consistent earnings.
  • Recent analyst activity around CMG has turned cautiously optimistic, while FRSH remains under pressure as it navigates the transition toward sustained profitability.
  • Investors comparing these two names are effectively weighing a battle-tested consumer discretionary giant against a smaller, higher-growth enterprise software challenger.

Introduction

Comparing Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) and Freshworks (FRSH) may seem like an unusual pairing at first glance — one is a fast-casual restaurant behemoth, the other a cloud-based customer engagement software provider. Yet both stocks occupy important positions in their respective sectors and have faced notable market reevaluations over the past year. This comparison is especially relevant for traders and investors who want to understand how two fundamentally different business models — a mature, cash-rich consumer brand and an emerging SaaS growth story — stack up in the current market environment. The contrast in their revenue profiles, profitability trajectories, and risk factors offers a useful lens for assessing relative market positioning.

CMG Overview and Recent Performance

Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) operates over 4,000 restaurants globally, with the vast majority located in the United States. The company popularized the fast-casual dining model by emphasizing responsibly sourced ingredients and customizable Mexican-inspired meals. After a multi-year period of exceptional growth — revenue surged from $8.6 billion in 2022 to $11.9 billion in 2025 — the chain has recently encountered headwinds. Full-year 2025 comparable restaurant sales declined 1.7%, marking the first same-store sales contraction since 2016, driven by lower transaction volumes and consumer caution around inflation. Operating margins narrowed from 16.9% to 16.2%, squeezed by higher labor costs and elevated ingredient prices, particularly in beef and chicken.

The stock has reflected these challenges. Over the past twelve months, CMG shares have declined approximately 36%, falling from the mid-$50s to around $33–$34 in recent trading. The company's 52-week range spans from $28.04 to $54.20. In response, management launched a "Recipe for Growth" strategy in early 2026, focused on menu innovation, enhanced digital engagement, artificial intelligence integration, and international expansion. Recent analyst commentary has turned somewhat more constructive — Mizuho raised its price target in mid-July 2026, citing improving traffic trends, while the consensus analyst rating remains a "Buy" with a 12-month target near $43. The company's next earnings report, scheduled for late July 2026, will be closely watched for signs of a turnaround in same-store sales and margin stabilization.

FRSH Overview and Recent Performance

Freshworks (FRSH) is a cloud-based software company that provides customer support, IT service management, and sales automation tools primarily to small and medium-sized businesses. Founded in 2010 and publicly listed since 2021, the company competes in the vast and highly competitive SaaS landscape. Revenue has grown steadily — from $498 million in 2022 to $839 million in 2025 — representing a compound annual growth trajectory in the mid-to-high teens. Fiscal 2025 marked a milestone: Freshworks posted its first full-year net profit of $183.7 million, a significant turnaround after years of operating losses.

However, the earnings picture has been uneven. The Q4 2025 profit was heavily influenced by one-time factors, and Q1 2026 results showed a return to a net loss of $4.8 million on revenue of $228.6 million. The stock has suffered considerable value erosion since its 2021 IPO, trading recently near $10–$11 per share — down roughly 77% from its debut levels. Over the past twelve months, FRSH has declined approximately 23%, with a 52-week range of $6.79 to $15.47. The company's market capitalization now stands around $3.1 billion. While operating cash flow generation has improved and return on equity (ROE) turned positive in late 2025, the market remains skeptical about the durability of Freshworks' profitability and its ability to sustain competitive differentiation in the crowded SaaS market.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking data-driven decision-making tools, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most effective AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively monitor thousands of tickers across global markets, but only those with the strongest real-time performance metrics and the best alignment with current market conditions earn placement in this dedicated section. The bots featured here span a wide variety of trading styles — from short-term swing trading to longer-duration trend following — and each bot comes with transparent performance statistics, including win rates, trade frequency, and historical drawdown figures. Many of the trending bots have demonstrated win rates in the range of 65% to 85% under favorable conditions, with some generating double-digit annualized returns. Whether you are evaluating stocks like CMG and FRSH or scanning for opportunities across other sectors, exploring the Trending AI Robots section can help you identify which trading strategies are currently resonating with live market dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The contrast between CMG and FRSH is sharp across nearly every relevant dimension. Starting with scale, Chipotle generated $11.9 billion in revenue in 2025 — more than fourteen times Freshworks' $839 million. CMG is firmly profitable with a P/E ratio of roughly 31, while FRSH is still establishing consistent earnings. On the growth front, however, Freshworks holds the advantage: its revenue expanded 16.4% in 2025 compared to Chipotle's 5.4%, and the SaaS company continues to benefit from secular digital transformation tailwinds.

Risk profiles diverge meaningfully. Chipotle faces consumer spending sensitivity, food cost inflation, and potential market saturation as its North American store count exceeds 4,000 locations. Freshworks contends with intense competition from far larger rivals such as Salesforce and Zendesk, plus the ongoing challenge of converting revenue growth into durable profitability. From a sentiment standpoint, CMG has recently attracted analyst upgrades and modest price-target increases based on early signs of traffic stabilization. FRSH, by contrast, has received less visible analyst attention, and its beaten-down stock price — trading at a roughly 77% discount to its IPO level — reflects persistent market skepticism. Sector exposure further differentiates them: Chipotle is a consumer cyclical play sensitive to macroeconomic spending patterns, while Freshworks is a technology growth name whose fortunes depend more on enterprise software adoption cycles.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market data and trend analysis, Tickeron's AI framework would likely tilt in favor of Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) in the current environment. The rationale centers on trend consistency and relative stability: despite recent same-store sales softness, CMG remains a highly cash-generative business with a proven track record, a clear turnaround strategy now underway, and a meaningful upgrade cycle from sell-side analysts that suggests improving fundamentals. The stock's pullback has brought its valuation to more historically reasonable levels, and early traffic data cited by Mizuho points toward a potential inflection. Meanwhile, FRSH, while showing revenue momentum, continues to grapple with inconsistent profitability and a deeply discounted market valuation that signals unresolved questions about its competitive moat. That said, AI-driven analysis favors probabilistic assessments rather than certainties — if Freshworks can string together consecutive quarters of profitable growth, the relative positioning could shift. For now, the weight of observable catalysts and trend momentum appears to benefit the larger, more established name in this comparison.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CMG vs. FRSH commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMG is a Hold and FRSH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (CMG: $32.01 vs. FRSH: $9.77)
Brand notoriety: CMG: Notable vs. FRSH: Not notable
CMG represents the Restaurants, while FRSH is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMG: 91% vs. FRSH: 27%
Market capitalization -- CMG: $41.06B vs. FRSH: $2.7B
CMG [@Restaurants] is valued at $41.06B. FRSH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $186.72B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $397.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.05B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than CMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the short-term than CMG.

Price Growth

CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а -6.40% price change this week, while FRSH (@Packaged Software) price change was -10.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.70%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-2.87% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

@Packaged Software (-4.90% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMG($41.1B) has a higher market cap than FRSH($2.7B). CMG has higher P/E ratio than FRSH: CMG (29.37) vs FRSH (15.91). CMG YTD gains are higher at: -13.486 vs. FRSH (-20.245). CMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.31B vs. FRSH (42.9M). CMG has more cash in the bank: 869M vs. FRSH (779M). FRSH has less debt than CMG: FRSH (38.8M) vs CMG (5.25B). CMG has higher revenues than FRSH: CMG (12.1B) vs FRSH (871M).
CMGFRSHCMG / FRSH
Capitalization41.1B2.7B1,521%
EBITDA2.31B42.9M5,382%
Gain YTD-13.486-20.24567%
P/E Ratio29.3715.91185%
Revenue12.1B871M1,389%
Total Cash869M779M112%
Total Debt5.25B38.8M13,521%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG vs FRSH: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
FRSH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8172
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9592
SMR RATING
1..100
2051
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8521
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRSH's Valuation (59) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (81). This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (95). This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's SMR Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FRSH (51). This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (61). This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMG (85). This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMGFRSH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICLN19.25N/A
N/A
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
QXQ32.18N/A
N/A
SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF
GSEP40.97-0.18
-0.44%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Sep
PRNT23.11-0.30
-1.26%
The 3D Printing ETF
NVTX20.25-2.08
-9.30%
Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
-0.59%
FRSH - CMG
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.88%
SG - CMG
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.13%
CAVA - CMG
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
CAKE - CMG
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
WING - CMG
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
More