Advertisement
CMS vs HAL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMS is a Hold and HAL is a Hold.
CMS | HAL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HAL's Valuation (28) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CMS (53) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
HAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CMS (72) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
HAL's SMR Rating (57) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CMS (66) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
HAL's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CMS (63) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
HAL's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMS (53) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMS’s over the last 12 months.
| CMS | HAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 80% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while HAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HAL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CMS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +1.39% price change this week, while HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -2.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.55%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
HAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (+0.56% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-2.44% weekly)The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
Advertisement
HAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAL has been closely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAL jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAL | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| NOV - HAL | 71% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| SLB - HAL | 70% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| BKR - HAL | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| WFRD - HAL | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| XPRO - HAL | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
More | ||||