Advertisement
CNOB vs PFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNOB is a Hold and PFS is a StrongBuy.
CNOB in -0.96% downward trend, declining for three consecutive days on October 14, 2026
Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where CNOB declined for three days, in 219 of 303 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
CNOB broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CNOB entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where CNOB's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 29 of 38 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 46 of 64 cases where CNOB's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CNOB as a result. In 59 of 95 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CNOB just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where CNOB's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
Following a +1.91% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CNOB advanced for three days, in 183 of 286 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 18 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 38 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.025) is normal, around the industry mean (1.246). P/E Ratio (9.531) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.217). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.130) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.025) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.457) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CNOB’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 81 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CNOB’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
PFS's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PFS turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where PFS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where PFS's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 22 of 34 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PFS as a result. In 48 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
Following a +1.94% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PFS advanced for three days, in 153 of 287 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 53%.
PFS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PFS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
The Aroon Indicator for PFS entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 13 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 33 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.011) is normal, around the industry mean (1.246). P/E Ratio (9.392) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.217). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.190) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.043) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.332) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. PFS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 67 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PFS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
CNOB | PFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PFS's Valuation (33) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (38) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.
PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (81) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.
PFS's SMR Rating (13) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (18) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.
CNOB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (50) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CNOB’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.
PFS's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNOB (94) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNOB’s over the last 12 months.
| CNOB | PFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 9 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 64% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNOB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CNOB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNOB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNOB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CNOB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.38% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNOB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
PFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+2.63% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
CNOB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOB has been closely correlated with PFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNOB jumps, then PFS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNOB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNOB | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| PFS - CNOB | 81% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| FULT - CNOB | 80% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| BUSE - CNOB | 80% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| BY - CNOB | 80% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| FRME - CNOB | 80% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IBX | 19.80 | 1.34 | +7.26% |
| Tradr 2X Long IBM Daily ETF (IBX) | |||
| KIQQ | 24.62 | 0.25 | +1.02% |
| KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF (KIQQ) | |||
| TURF | 34.30 | 0.05 | +0.13% |
| T. Rowe Price Natural Resource ETF (TURF) | |||
| SEIV | 50.12 | 0.06 | +0.12% |
| SEI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) | |||
| CCOM | 23.78 | N/A | N/A |
| Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM) | |||