CNQ
Price
$31.55
Change
+$0.02 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
81.73B
43 days until earnings call
PR
Price
$15.47
Change
+$0.09 (+0.58%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.28B
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CNQ vs PR

Header iconCNQ vs PR Comparison
Open Charts CNQ vs PRBanner chart's image
Canadian Natural Resources
Price$31.55
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
Volume$12.23M
Capitalization81.73B
Permian Resources
Price$15.47
Change+$0.09 (+0.58%)
Volume$102.59K
Capitalization10.28B
CNQ vs PR Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNQ vs. PR commentary
Jan 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNQ is a StrongBuy and PR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2025
Stock price -- (CNQ: $31.55 vs. PR: $15.48)
Brand notoriety: CNQ: Notable vs. PR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNQ: 258% vs. PR: 99%
Market capitalization -- CNQ: $81.73B vs. PR: $10.28B
CNQ [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $81.73B. PR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $10.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNQ is a better buy in the long-term than PR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CNQ and PR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CNQ (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -3.52% price change this week, while PR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +3.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +61.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNQ is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

PR is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+1.43% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNQ($81.7B) has a higher market cap than PR($10.3B). PR (14.29) and CNQ (13.95) have similar P/E ratio . PR YTD gains are higher at: 7.650 vs. CNQ (2.203). CNQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.3B vs. PR (2.2B). CNQ has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. PR (73.3M). PR has less debt than CNQ: PR (3.91B) vs CNQ (10.8B). CNQ has higher revenues than PR: CNQ (40.8B) vs PR (3.12B).
CNQPRCNQ / PR
Capitalization81.7B10.3B793%
EBITDA17.3B2.2B785%
Gain YTD2.2037.65029%
P/E Ratio13.9514.2998%
Revenue40.8B3.12B1,307%
Total Cash1.4B73.3M1,913%
Total Debt10.8B3.91B276%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNQ vs PR: Fundamental Ratings
CNQ
PR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2125
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
239
SMR RATING
1..100
4953
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4993
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNQ's Valuation (37) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PR (47). This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to PR’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (23). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's SMR Rating (49) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PR (53). This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to PR’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (58). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PR (93). This means that CNQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than PR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNQPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLBS1.300.04
+3.17%
Globus Maritime Limited
GOLD15.580.13
+0.84%
Barrick Gold Corp
INVA17.680.12
+0.68%
Innoviva
HP35.440.19
+0.54%
Helmerich & Payne
AMTX2.60-0.19
-6.81%
Aemetis

CNQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNQ has been closely correlated with MEGEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNQ jumps, then MEGEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNQ
1D Price
Change %
CNQ100%
+0.06%
MEGEF - CNQ
78%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
EOG - CNQ
78%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
DVN - CNQ
76%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
VET - CNQ
74%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
PR - CNQ
72%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
More

PR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PR has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PR jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PR
1D Price
Change %
PR100%
+0.58%
MTDR - PR
86%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
MGY - PR
82%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
OVV - PR
81%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
CIVI - PR
81%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
NOG - PR
78%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
More