CNQ
Price
$47.77
Change
-$0.51 (-1.06%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
102.21B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PR
Price
$21.29
Change
-$0.68 (-3.10%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
19.06B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNQ vs PR

CNQ vs PR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNQ vs. PR commentary
Sep 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNQ is a StrongBuy and PR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNQ vs PR: Fundamental Ratings
CNQ
PR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7073
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2011
SMR RATING
1..100
3666
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
319
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PR's Valuation (51) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (67). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (20). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's SMR Rating (36) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PR (66). This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to PR’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (41). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

PR's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (31). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNQPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CNQ: $48.28 vs. PR: $21.97)
Brand notoriety: CNQ: Notable vs. PR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNQ: 98% vs. PR: 94%
Market capitalization -- CNQ: $102.21B vs. PR: $19.06B
CNQ [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $102.21B. PR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $19.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $100 to $158.37B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $10.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNQ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while PR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNQ is a better buy in the long-term than PR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CNQ and PR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CNQ (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -4.05% price change this week, while PR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -6.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -7.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

PR is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-7.54% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CNQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PZZA20.290.51
+2.58%
Papa John's International
VATE8.180.02
+0.25%
INNOVATE Corp
EXE87.650.16
+0.18%
Expand Energy Corporation
FHB25.50-0.26
-1.01%
First Hawaiian
UZX1.75-0.12
-6.41%
Linkage Global Inc

CNQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNQ has been closely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNQ jumps, then VET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNQ
1D Price
Change %
CNQ100%
-2.74%
VET - CNQ
77%
Closely correlated
-4.87%
OVV - CNQ
76%
Closely correlated
-3.51%
EOG - CNQ
76%
Closely correlated
-1.98%
CHRD - CNQ
76%
Closely correlated
-3.50%
PR - CNQ
74%
Closely correlated
-3.47%
More

PR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PR has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PR jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PR
1D Price
Change %
PR100%
-3.47%
OVV - PR
87%
Closely correlated
-3.51%
CHRD - PR
86%
Closely correlated
-3.50%
FANG - PR
83%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
DVN - PR
83%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
MTDR - PR
82%
Closely correlated
-4.79%
More