COHU
Price
$64.31
Change
-$5.76 (-8.22%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.31B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFS
Price
$83.37
Change
-$6.30 (-7.03%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.2B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COHU vs GFS

COHU vs GFS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cohu (COHU) vs. GlobalFoundries (GFS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both COHU and GFS have posted robust year-to-date gains exceeding 85%, reflecting strength in the semiconductor sector.
  • GFS leads with a significantly larger market capitalization of $35.64 billion compared to COHU's $2.15 billion, alongside positive profitability metrics.
  • COHU reported a 57% year-over-year increase in orders during recent quarters, driven by demand for AI datacenter processor testing, boosting its 2026 growth outlook to 20-25%.
  • GFS has shown superior short-term momentum, with approximately 49% gains over the recent month, amid recoveries in automotive, aerospace, and defense markets.
  • COHU carries higher risk with negative profit margins and a beta of 1.61, while GFS offers better stability (beta 1.46, ROE (return on equity) 7.79%).

Introduction

In the semiconductor industry, where AI-driven demand and supply chain dynamics shape market trends, COHU and GFS represent distinct yet complementary plays. Cohu provides testing and inspection equipment for chips, while GlobalFoundries operates as a leading foundry manufacturing semiconductors. This comparison is particularly relevant for traders eyeing sector rotation and investors seeking exposure to high-performance computing (HPC) growth amid recent market volatility. By examining recent performance, financial health, and catalysts, readers can assess relative positioning in today's environment.

COHU Overview and Recent Performance

Cohu, Inc. specializes in semiconductor test and inspection equipment, serving the backend of the chip production process. In recent market activity, COHU shares traded around $45.59, reflecting year-to-date gains of nearly 96% from lows near $15. The stock has benefited from a first-quarter revenue of $125.1 million, with 60% recurring, and gross margins at 46.3%. Orders surged 57% year-over-year, fueled by multi-unit deals for next-generation AI datacenter processors, enhancing confidence in high-performance computing revenue for 2026. Analysts have responded positively, lifting price targets post-earnings, though trailing profitability remains challenged with negative EPS (earnings per share) of -1.19. Sentiment has shifted upward on AI exposure, despite broader sector pressures.

GFS Overview and Recent Performance

GlobalFoundries Inc. is a pure-play semiconductor foundry, focusing on manufacturing chips for automotive, aerospace, defense, and communications. Shares of GFS recently closed near $64.91, delivering year-to-date returns of about 86% and nearly 49% over the past month. The company anticipates slight year-over-year growth in upcoming quarterly results, with expected revenue of $1.62 billion and EPS of $0.35. Recoveries in diversified end-markets like automotive and defense have supported momentum, contrasting with peers in consumer electronics. Positive profitability (13.03% margin) and a manageable debt-to-equity ratio of 14.25% underpin stability, though analyst targets average lower relative to current levels. Recent price strength signals improving sentiment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 351 available, selecting those best suited to current market conditions like volatility in AI infrastructure and semiconductors. These bots employ machine learning for real-time signals across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, with strategies spanning 5-minute to 60-minute timeframes and risk controls such as 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss corridors. Performance highlights include annualized returns up to +163%, win rates reaching 88%, profit factors from 1.51 to 11.70, and profit-to-drawdown ratios as high as 17.02. Semiconductor-themed bots, for instance, show +97% annualized returns with 63% win rates on tickers like LRCX and ASML. Diverse styles—from growth chasers to volatility plays—cater to varied risk appetites. Explore these high-performing options to enhance your trading edge in dynamic markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

COHU focuses on niche test equipment, contrasting GFS's scale in wafer fabrication, exposing COHU to concentrated backend risks but upside from AI testing demand. Growth drivers differ: COHU's 20-25% revenue outlook ties to HPC ramps, while GFS leverages broad recoveries in non-AI segments. Recent momentum favors GFS with sharper short-term gains, versus COHU's post-earnings lift. Risk profiles highlight trade-offs—COHU's higher beta (1.61) and negative ROE (-6.96%) signal volatility, against GFS's solid 7.79% ROE and lower leverage. Both benefit from semiconductor tailwinds, but GFS offers greater market cap stability ($35B+), while COHU provides smaller-cap growth potential.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward GFS with higher probability for sustained outperformance. This reflects its profitability edge, lower relative risk via balanced debt and positive margins, alongside consistent momentum in recent weeks. While COHU shows promising AI catalysts and order growth, GFS's scale and sector diversification position it more favorably amid uncertain chip cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COHU vs. GFS commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COHU is a Hold and GFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (COHU: $70.12 vs. GFS: $89.67)
Brand notoriety: COHU and GFS are both not notable
COHU represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while GFS is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COHU: 55% vs. GFS: 72%
Market capitalization -- COHU: $3.31B vs. GFS: $49.2B
COHU [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $3.31B. GFS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $49.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $732.93B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.05T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $80.79B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $205.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COHU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COHU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COHU is a better buy in the long-term than GFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COHU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COHU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both COHU and GFS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

COHU (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +9.48% price change this week, while GFS (@Semiconductors) price change was +6.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +129.72%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

COHU is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.28% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (-0.05% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFS($49.2B) has a higher market cap than COHU($3.31B). COHU (51.42) and GFS (51.10) have similar P/E ratio . COHU YTD gains are higher at: 201.332 vs. GFS (156.787). GFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.26B vs. COHU (6.05M). GFS has more cash in the bank: 3.07B vs. COHU (489M). COHU has less debt than GFS: COHU (327M) vs GFS (1.72B). GFS has higher revenues than COHU: GFS (6.84B) vs COHU (481M).
COHUGFSCOHU / GFS
Capitalization3.31B49.2B7%
EBITDA6.05M2.26B0%
Gain YTD201.332156.787128%
P/E Ratio51.4251.10101%
Revenue481M6.84B7%
Total Cash489M3.07B16%
Total Debt327M1.72B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COHU: Fundamental Ratings
COHU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
31
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COHUGFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%