COHU
Price
$54.47
Change
-$0.52 (-0.95%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFS
Price
$74.82
Change
-$0.44 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
41.03B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COHU vs GFS

Header iconCOHU vs GFS Comparison
Open Charts COHU vs GFSBanner chart's image
COHU vs GFS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cohu (COHU) vs. GlobalFoundries (GFS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both COHU and GFS have posted robust year-to-date gains exceeding 85%, reflecting strength in the semiconductor sector.
  • GFS leads with a significantly larger market capitalization of $35.64 billion compared to COHU's $2.15 billion, alongside positive profitability metrics.
  • COHU reported a 57% year-over-year increase in orders during recent quarters, driven by demand for AI datacenter processor testing, boosting its 2026 growth outlook to 20-25%.
  • GFS has shown superior short-term momentum, with approximately 49% gains over the recent month, amid recoveries in automotive, aerospace, and defense markets.
  • COHU carries higher risk with negative profit margins and a beta of 1.61, while GFS offers better stability (beta 1.46, ROE (return on equity) 7.79%).

Introduction

In the semiconductor industry, where AI-driven demand and supply chain dynamics shape market trends, COHU and GFS represent distinct yet complementary plays. Cohu provides testing and inspection equipment for chips, while GlobalFoundries operates as a leading foundry manufacturing semiconductors. This comparison is particularly relevant for traders eyeing sector rotation and investors seeking exposure to high-performance computing (HPC) growth amid recent market volatility. By examining recent performance, financial health, and catalysts, readers can assess relative positioning in today's environment.

COHU Overview and Recent Performance

Cohu, Inc. specializes in semiconductor test and inspection equipment, serving the backend of the chip production process. In recent market activity, COHU shares traded around $45.59, reflecting year-to-date gains of nearly 96% from lows near $15. The stock has benefited from a first-quarter revenue of $125.1 million, with 60% recurring, and gross margins at 46.3%. Orders surged 57% year-over-year, fueled by multi-unit deals for next-generation AI datacenter processors, enhancing confidence in high-performance computing revenue for 2026. Analysts have responded positively, lifting price targets post-earnings, though trailing profitability remains challenged with negative EPS (earnings per share) of -1.19. Sentiment has shifted upward on AI exposure, despite broader sector pressures.

GFS Overview and Recent Performance

GlobalFoundries Inc. is a pure-play semiconductor foundry, focusing on manufacturing chips for automotive, aerospace, defense, and communications. Shares of GFS recently closed near $64.91, delivering year-to-date returns of about 86% and nearly 49% over the past month. The company anticipates slight year-over-year growth in upcoming quarterly results, with expected revenue of $1.62 billion and EPS of $0.35. Recoveries in diversified end-markets like automotive and defense have supported momentum, contrasting with peers in consumer electronics. Positive profitability (13.03% margin) and a manageable debt-to-equity ratio of 14.25% underpin stability, though analyst targets average lower relative to current levels. Recent price strength signals improving sentiment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 351 available, selecting those best suited to current market conditions like volatility in AI infrastructure and semiconductors. These bots employ machine learning for real-time signals across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, with strategies spanning 5-minute to 60-minute timeframes and risk controls such as 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss corridors. Performance highlights include annualized returns up to +163%, win rates reaching 88%, profit factors from 1.51 to 11.70, and profit-to-drawdown ratios as high as 17.02. Semiconductor-themed bots, for instance, show +97% annualized returns with 63% win rates on tickers like LRCX and ASML. Diverse styles—from growth chasers to volatility plays—cater to varied risk appetites. Explore these high-performing options to enhance your trading edge in dynamic markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

COHU focuses on niche test equipment, contrasting GFS's scale in wafer fabrication, exposing COHU to concentrated backend risks but upside from AI testing demand. Growth drivers differ: COHU's 20-25% revenue outlook ties to HPC ramps, while GFS leverages broad recoveries in non-AI segments. Recent momentum favors GFS with sharper short-term gains, versus COHU's post-earnings lift. Risk profiles highlight trade-offs—COHU's higher beta (1.61) and negative ROE (-6.96%) signal volatility, against GFS's solid 7.79% ROE and lower leverage. Both benefit from semiconductor tailwinds, but GFS offers greater market cap stability ($35B+), while COHU provides smaller-cap growth potential.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward GFS with higher probability for sustained outperformance. This reflects its profitability edge, lower relative risk via balanced debt and positive margins, alongside consistent momentum in recent weeks. While COHU shows promising AI catalysts and order growth, GFS's scale and sector diversification position it more favorably amid uncertain chip cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COHU vs. GFS commentary
Jun 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COHU is a Hold and GFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 11, 2026
Stock price -- (COHU: $54.51 vs. GFS: $74.82)
Brand notoriety: COHU and GFS are both not notable
COHU represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while GFS is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COHU: 120% vs. GFS: 60%
Market capitalization -- COHU: $2.57B vs. GFS: $41.03B
COHU [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $2.57B. GFS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $41.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $669.83B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.85T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $66.61B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $182.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COHU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COHU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COHU is a better buy in the long-term than GFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COHU’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COHU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFS is a better buy in the short-term than COHU.

Price Growth

COHU (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -2.87% price change this week, while GFS (@Semiconductors) price change was -12.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -5.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +104.94%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -14.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +76.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

COHU is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-5.88% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (-14.22% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFS($41B) has a higher market cap than COHU($2.57B). COHU (51.42) and GFS (51.10) have similar P/E ratio . COHU YTD gains are higher at: 134.250 vs. GFS (114.261). GFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.26B vs. COHU (6.05M). GFS has more cash in the bank: 3.07B vs. COHU (489M). COHU has less debt than GFS: COHU (327M) vs GFS (1.72B). GFS has higher revenues than COHU: GFS (6.84B) vs COHU (481M).
COHUGFSCOHU / GFS
Capitalization2.57B41B6%
EBITDA6.05M2.26B0%
Gain YTD134.250114.261117%
P/E Ratio51.4251.10101%
Revenue481M6.84B7%
Total Cash489M3.07B16%
Total Debt327M1.72B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COHU: Fundamental Ratings
COHU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COHUGFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COHU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBAU31.16N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Aug
FNCL74.44-0.28
-0.37%
Fidelity MSCI Financials ETF
VDIG61.08-0.63
-1.02%
Vanguard Wellington Dividend Gr Actv ETF
KGRN25.36-0.41
-1.60%
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Tech ETF
URTY72.70-2.35
-3.13%
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000

COHU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COHU has been closely correlated with DIOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COHU jumps, then DIOD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COHU
1D Price
Change %
COHU100%
-0.87%
DIOD - COHU
73%
Closely correlated
-2.97%
POWI - COHU
70%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
UCTT - COHU
69%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
NXPI - COHU
68%
Closely correlated
-3.98%
SLAB - COHU
68%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
More

GFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFS
1D Price
Change %
GFS100%
-0.58%
KLIC - GFS
72%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
FORM - GFS
69%
Closely correlated
-3.95%
ENTG - GFS
67%
Closely correlated
-4.07%
LRCX - GFS
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
VECO - GFS
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
More