Advertisement
COLM vs SMPL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COLM is a Hold and SMPL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COLM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- COLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SMPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COLM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COLM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SMPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
COLM (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а -6.40% price change this week, while SMPL (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -7.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -5.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.85%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -2.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
COLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
SMPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Apparel/Footwear (-5.46% weekly)Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-2.95% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| COLM | SMPL | COLM / SMPL | |
| Capitalization | 4.85B | 3.4B | 143% |
| EBITDA | 462M | 234M | 197% |
| Gain YTD | -32.043 | -21.883 | 146% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.81 | 26.07 | 76% |
| Revenue | 3.49B | 1.25B | 279% |
| Total Cash | 765M | 121M | 632% |
| Total Debt | 408M | 272M | 150% |
COLM | SMPL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COLM's Valuation (41) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMPL (88) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that COLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
SMPL's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COLM (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew somewhat faster than COLM’s over the last 12 months.
COLM's SMR Rating (60) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as SMPL (75) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that COLM’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
SMPL's Price Growth Rating (79) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as COLM (83) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew similarly to COLM’s over the last 12 months.
SMPL's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as COLM (86) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew similarly to COLM’s over the last 12 months.
| COLM | SMPL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 53% | 8 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
COLM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COLM has been loosely correlated with SHOO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COLM jumps, then SHOO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COLM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLM | 100% | -3.13% | ||
| SHOO - COLM | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| PVH - COLM | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| VFC - COLM | 62% Loosely correlated | -7.86% | ||
| KTB - COLM | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| NKE - COLM | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
More | ||||
SMPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMPL has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMPL jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMPL | 100% | -2.09% | ||
| FLO - SMPL | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| MKC - SMPL | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| KHC - SMPL | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.62% | ||
| GIS - SMPL | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| JJSF - SMPL | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.50% | ||
More | ||||