COMP
Price
$12.00
Change
-$0.18 (-1.48%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.97B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSLY
Price
$20.72
Change
+$0.40 (+1.97%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.24B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COMP vs FSLY

COMP vs FSLY Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COMP vs. FSLY commentary
Jul 19, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COMP is a Hold and FSLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 19, 2026
Stock price -- (COMP: $12.00 vs. FSLY: $20.72)
Brand notoriety: COMP: Not notable vs. FSLY: Notable
COMP represents the Real Estate Development, while FSLY is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COMP: 81% vs. FSLY: 160%
Market capitalization -- COMP: $8.97B vs. FSLY: $3.24B
COMP [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $8.97B. FSLY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $611.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $2.87B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both COMP and FSLY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COMP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSLY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COMP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSLY is a better buy in the short-term than COMP.

Price Growth

COMP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +2.39% price change this week, while FSLY (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.45%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

COMP is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

FSLY is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.61% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

@Packaged Software (-2.76% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COMP($8.97B) has a higher market cap than FSLY($3.24B). FSLY YTD gains are higher at: 103.536 vs. COMP (13.529). FSLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -20.6M vs. COMP (-105.2M). COMP has more cash in the bank: 484M vs. FSLY (330M). FSLY has less debt than COMP: FSLY (398M) vs COMP (4.07B). COMP has higher revenues than FSLY: COMP (8.31B) vs FSLY (653M).
COMPFSLYCOMP / FSLY
Capitalization8.97B3.24B276%
EBITDA-105.2M-20.6M511%
Gain YTD13.529103.53613%
P/E Ratio600.00N/A-
Revenue8.31B653M1,273%
Total Cash484M330M147%
Total Debt4.07B398M1,023%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSLY: Fundamental Ratings
FSLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COMPFSLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOXA105.360.39
+0.38%
Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF
KBWD12.43N/A
N/A
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yld Fincl ETF
MYCN24.30N/A
N/A
State Street® My2034 Corporate Bond ETF
XBJL39.91-0.16
-0.40%
Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF Jul
CSQ20.20-0.27
-1.32%
Calamos Strategic Total Return

COMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COMP has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COMP jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COMP
1D Price
Change %
COMP100%
-1.48%
COIN - COMP
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
AFRM - COMP
62%
Loosely correlated
-4.72%
U - COMP
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
CLSK - COMP
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
TDOC - COMP
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
More

FSLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSLY has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSLY jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSLY
1D Price
Change %
FSLY100%
+1.97%
COIN - FSLY
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
CLSK - FSLY
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
RIOT - FSLY
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
RAMP - FSLY
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
COMP - FSLY
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
More