COSO
Price
$27.39
Change
+$0.14 (+0.51%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
331.05M
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMBK
Price
$51.04
Change
+$0.09 (+0.18%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
872.71M
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COSO vs SMBK

COSO vs SMBK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COSO vs. SMBK commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSO is a Hold and SMBK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (COSO: $27.39 vs. SMBK: $51.04)
Brand notoriety: COSO and SMBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COSO: 245% vs. SMBK: 149%
Market capitalization -- COSO: $331.05M vs. SMBK: $872.71M
COSO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $331.05M. SMBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $872.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COSO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COSO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both COSO and SMBK are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COSO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COSO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COSO is a better buy in the short-term than SMBK.

Price Growth

COSO (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.51% price change this week, while SMBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

COSO is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

SMBK is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMBK($873M) has a higher market cap than COSO($331M). SMBK has higher P/E ratio than COSO: SMBK (15.06) vs COSO (12.34). SMBK YTD gains are higher at: 38.792 vs. COSO (18.491). SMBK has more cash in the bank: 56.7M vs. COSO (11.5M). COSO has less debt than SMBK: COSO (30M) vs SMBK (98.7M). SMBK has higher revenues than COSO: SMBK (203M) vs COSO (87M).
COSOSMBKCOSO / SMBK
Capitalization331M873M38%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.49138.79248%
P/E Ratio12.3415.0682%
Revenue87M203M43%
Total Cash11.5M56.7M20%
Total Debt30M98.7M30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COSO vs SMBK: Fundamental Ratings
COSO
SMBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9792
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4913
SMR RATING
1..100
6058
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2139
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COSO's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as SMBK (80) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COSO’s stock grew similarly to SMBK’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COSO (49) in the null industry. This means that SMBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than COSO’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's SMR Rating (58) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COSO (60) in the null industry. This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to COSO’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COSO (47) in the null industry. This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to COSO’s over the last 12 months.

COSO's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as SMBK (39) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COSO’s stock grew similarly to SMBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSOSMBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSLCX77.870.63
+0.82%
American Funds SMALLCAP World R-3
WISIX15.260.11
+0.73%
William Blair International Sm Cap Gr I
FLMFX11.370.06
+0.53%
Meeder Muirfield Retail
NMIAX30.220.15
+0.50%
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
FVADX74.500.19
+0.26%
Franklin Small Cap Value Adv

COSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COSO has been loosely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COSO jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COSO
1D Price
Change %
COSO100%
+0.51%
BY - COSO
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
SMBK - COSO
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
FCCO - COSO
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
ASB - COSO
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
FBIZ - COSO
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More

SMBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMBK has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMBK jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMBK
1D Price
Change %
SMBK100%
+0.18%
SRCE - SMBK
83%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
UVSP - SMBK
82%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
IBCP - SMBK
81%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
BY - SMBK
81%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
PFIS - SMBK
80%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
More