COTY vs SKIN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COTY is a Hold and SKIN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COTY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSKIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- COTY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SKIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COTY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COTY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SKIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
COTY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -5.55% price change this week, while SKIN (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +5.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
COTY is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
SKIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-1.81% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| COTY | SKIN | COTY / SKIN | |
| Capitalization | 10.6B | 529M | 2,004% |
| EBITDA | 1.22B | -56M | -2,186% |
| Gain YTD | -41.063 | -48.232 | 85% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.97 | 53.48 | 64% |
| Revenue | 6.01B | 398M | 1,510% |
| Total Cash | 450M | 523M | 86% |
| Total Debt | 4.01B | 752M | 533% |
COTY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COTY | SKIN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 28 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 77% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IBDW | 20.60 | -0.02 | -0.10% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corp ETF | |||
| SCHD | 27.81 | -0.06 | -0.22% |
| Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF™ | |||
| YMAR | 23.07 | -0.06 | -0.25% |
| FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bffr ETF Mar | |||
| TBT | 34.63 | -0.16 | -0.46% |
| ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury | |||
| ENOR | 22.61 | -0.18 | -0.80% |
| iShares MSCI Norway ETF | |||
COTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COTY has been loosely correlated with LRLCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COTY jumps, then LRLCY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COTY | 100% | -1.88% | ||
| LRLCY - COTY | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| IPAR - COTY | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| EL - COTY | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| BDRFY - COTY | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| LRLCF - COTY | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
More | ||||