COUR
Price
$5.31
Change
-$0.03 (-0.56%)
Updated
Jun 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.53B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MC
Price
$69.11
Change
+$1.41 (+2.08%)
Updated
Jun 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.04B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COUR vs MC

Header iconCOUR vs MC Comparison
Open Charts COUR vs MCBanner chart's image
COUR vs MC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COUR vs. MC commentary
Jun 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COUR is a Hold and MC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2026
Stock price -- (COUR: $5.34 vs. MC: $67.70)
Brand notoriety: COUR and MC are both not notable
COUR represents the Other Consumer Specialties, while MC is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COUR: 92% vs. MC: 97%
Market capitalization -- COUR: $1.53B vs. MC: $5.04B
COUR [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $1.53B. MC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $5.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.45B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.25B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COUR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COUR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the long-term than COUR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COUR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COUR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the short-term than COUR.

Price Growth

COUR (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -2.38% price change this week, while MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.63%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

COUR is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

MC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (-2.30% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.32% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($5.04B) has a higher market cap than COUR($1.53B). MC YTD gains are higher at: 0.471 vs. COUR (-27.446). MC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 290M vs. COUR (-59.1M). COUR has more cash in the bank: 790M vs. MC (153M). COUR has less debt than MC: COUR (3.1M) vs MC (267M). MC has higher revenues than COUR: MC (1.53B) vs COUR (774M).
COURMCCOUR / MC
Capitalization1.53B5.04B30%
EBITDA-59.1M290M-20%
Gain YTD-27.4460.471-5,827%
P/E RatioN/A24.35-
Revenue774M1.53B51%
Total Cash790M153M516%
Total Debt3.1M267M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC: Fundamental Ratings
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COURMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COUR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KROP34.330.56
+1.67%
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
AVDE89.980.53
+0.59%
Avantis International Equity ETF
QDEC35.280.13
+0.37%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Dec
PDDL12.860.01
+0.11%
GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF
PHEQ34.280.03
+0.07%
Parametric Hedged Equity ETF

COUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COUR has been loosely correlated with ARLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COUR jumps, then ARLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COUR
1D Price
Change %
COUR100%
+0.19%
ARLO - COUR
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
ATAI - COUR
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.16%
RGP - COUR
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
EVLV - COUR
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
MSA - COUR
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
More

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
-1.78%
EVR - MC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
PJT - MC
80%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
HLI - MC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
PIPR - MC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
RJF - MC
76%
Closely correlated
+2.65%
More