HLI
Price
$127.74
Change
-$2.20 (-1.69%)
Updated
Sep 24, 12:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.15B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MC
Price
$56.88
Change
-$1.30 (-2.23%)
Updated
Sep 24, 12:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.36B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLI vs MC

HLI vs MC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLI vs. MC commentary
Sep 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLI is a Hold and MC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLI vs MC: Fundamental Ratings
HLI
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3457
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6477
SMR RATING
1..100
4923
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8480
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (9) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (13). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.

HLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (77). This means that HLI’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MC's SMR Rating (23) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (49). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.

HLI's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (62). This means that HLI’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MC's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (84). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLIMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2026
Stock price -- (HLI: $129.94 vs. MC: $58.18)
Brand notoriety: HLI and MC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLI: 61% vs. MC: 65%
Market capitalization -- HLI: $9.15B vs. MC: $4.36B
HLI [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $9.15B. MC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $590 to $314.4B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HLI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLI is a better buy in the long-term than MC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLI is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

HLI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.31% price change this week, while MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +8.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

MC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+8.40% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
HLI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PROM.X5.0675660.107605
+2.17%
Prom cryptocurrency
ARDR.X0.0290460.000199
+0.69%
Ardor cryptocurrency
ASR.X0.851374-0.023712
-2.71%
AS Roma Fan Token cryptocurrency
ICP.X2.922025-0.097413
-3.23%
Internet Computer cryptocurrency
AUTO.X2.284734-0.098729
-4.14%
Auto cryptocurrency

HLI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLI has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLI jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLI
1D Price
Change %
HLI100%
-0.79%
RJF - HLI
76%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
PJT - HLI
66%
Closely correlated
-0.60%
NDAQ - HLI
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
MC - HLI
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
MCO - HLI
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
More

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
-1.19%
EVR - MC
84%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
PJT - MC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.60%
RJF - MC
76%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
LAZ - MC
74%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
PIPR - MC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
More