HLI
Price
$137.89
Change
+$2.27 (+1.67%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
9.52B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MC
Price
$67.70
Change
-$1.23 (-1.78%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.04B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLI vs MC

Header iconHLI vs MC Comparison
Open Charts HLI vs MCBanner chart's image
HLI vs MC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLI vs. MC commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLI is a Hold and MC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (HLI: $137.89 vs. MC: $67.70)
Brand notoriety: HLI and MC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLI: 91% vs. MC: 97%
Market capitalization -- HLI: $9.52B vs. MC: $5.04B
HLI [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $9.52B. MC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $5.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HLI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the long-term than HLI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLI is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

HLI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLI is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

MC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.59% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLI($9.52B) has a higher market cap than MC($5.04B). MC has higher P/E ratio than HLI: MC (24.35) vs HLI (22.17). MC YTD gains are higher at: 0.471 vs. HLI (-20.154). HLI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 661M vs. MC (290M). HLI has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. MC (153M). MC has less debt than HLI: MC (267M) vs HLI (492M). HLI has higher revenues than MC: HLI (2.62B) vs MC (1.53B).
HLIMCHLI / MC
Capitalization9.52B5.04B189%
EBITDA661M290M228%
Gain YTD-20.1540.471-4,279%
P/E Ratio22.1724.3591%
Revenue2.62B1.53B171%
Total Cash1.32B153M860%
Total Debt492M267M184%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLI vs MC: Fundamental Ratings
HLI
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6491
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4954
SMR RATING
1..100
4721
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7660
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (13). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.

HLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (54). This means that HLI’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MC's SMR Rating (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (47). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.

MC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (73). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.

MC's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (76). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLIMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRTS6.950.43
+6.60%
Carparts.Com Inc.
EZPW31.250.50
+1.63%
EZCORP
GDDY76.241.07
+1.42%
GoDaddy
SES1.07N/A
N/A
SES AI Corp
FIGXU10.27N/A
N/A
Figx Capital Acquisition Corp

HLI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLI has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLI jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLI
1D Price
Change %
HLI100%
+1.67%
RJF - HLI
76%
Closely correlated
+2.65%
PJT - HLI
73%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
MC - HLI
69%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
PIPR - HLI
66%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
EVR - HLI
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
More

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
-1.78%
EVR - MC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
PJT - MC
80%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
HLI - MC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
PIPR - MC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
RJF - MC
76%
Closely correlated
+2.65%
More