Advertisement
COWG vs RMBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Hold and RMBS is a Buy.
RMBS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COWG | RMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BIOY | 20.50 | 0.08 | +0.42% |
| GraniteShares YieldBOOST Biotech ETF (BIOY) | |||
| WEAT | 25.05 | 0.08 | +0.32% |
| Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) | |||
| LDUR | 94.07 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) | |||
| EZRO | 25.24 | N/A | -0.02% |
| AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF (EZRO) | |||
| IAE | 8.78 | -0.07 | -0.79% |
| VOYA ASIA PACIFIC HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY Income FUND | |||
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| LRCX - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| KLAC - COWG | 68% Closely correlated | +3.89% | ||
| AMAT - COWG | 67% Closely correlated | +5.19% | ||
| LSCC - COWG | 66% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| RMBS - COWG | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
More | ||||
RMBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMBS | 100% | +0.98% | ||
| LRCX - RMBS | 77% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| AMKR - RMBS | 77% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
| KLIC - RMBS | 76% Closely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| VECO - RMBS | 75% Closely correlated | +4.69% | ||
| KLAC - RMBS | 74% Closely correlated | +3.89% | ||
More | ||||