CX
Price
$12.14
Change
-$0.44 (-3.50%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.15B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTAM
Price
$17.88
Change
-$0.33 (-1.81%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.36B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CX vs TTAM

CX vs TTAM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. TTAM commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a StrongBuy and TTAM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CX: $12.58 vs. TTAM: $18.21)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. TTAM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 52% vs. TTAM: 93%
Market capitalization -- CX: $18.15B vs. TTAM: $3.36B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $18.15B. TTAM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $13.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTAM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TTAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTAM is a better buy in the long-term than CX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TTAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTAM is a better buy in the short-term than CX.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а -2.17% price change this week, while TTAM (@Construction Materials) price change was +6.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

TTAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.27% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($18.2B) has a higher market cap than TTAM($3.36B). CX has higher P/E ratio than TTAM: CX (36.46) vs TTAM (18.21). TTAM YTD gains are higher at: 11.016 vs. CX (9.980). CX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.75B vs. TTAM (381M). TTAM has less debt than CX: TTAM (455M) vs CX (7.46B). CX has higher revenues than TTAM: CX (16.5B) vs TTAM (1.67B).
CXTTAMCX / TTAM
Capitalization18.2B3.36B542%
EBITDA2.75B381M721%
Gain YTD9.98011.01691%
P/E Ratio36.4618.21200%
Revenue16.5B1.67B988%
Total Cash330MN/A-
Total Debt7.46B455M1,640%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX: Fundamental Ratings
CX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
18
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXTTAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OPTZ49.360.62
+1.26%
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
NFLT22.920.01
+0.02%
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sect Bd ETF
RDFI23.37-0.03
-0.13%
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
GVI105.71-0.18
-0.17%
iShares Intermediate Govt/Crdt Bd ETF
PRCS27.91-0.23
-0.83%
Parnassus Core Select ETF

CX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with TTAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then TTAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
-1.18%
TTAM - CX
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
CRH - CX
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
MLM - CX
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
VMC - CX
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
EXP - CX
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
More

TTAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAM has been loosely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTAM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTAM
1D Price
Change %
TTAM100%
-0.87%
EXP - TTAM
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
MLM - TTAM
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
CRH - TTAM
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
VMC - TTAM
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
CX - TTAM
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
More