Advertisement
CX vs TTAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a StrongBuy and TTAM is a Hold.
CX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CX | TTAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 7 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 67% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while TTAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TTAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TTAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а -6.67% price change this week, while TTAM (@Construction Materials) price change was -2.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -16.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
CX is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
TTAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (-3.69% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NEHI | 33.85 | 0.15 | +0.46% |
| NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF | |||
| HOOZ | 8.22 | N/A | N/A |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Short Hood ETF | |||
| DFAR | 24.53 | -0.07 | -0.28% |
| Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) | |||
| ADBG | 3.72 | -0.05 | -1.20% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) | |||
| PBW | 29.93 | -0.54 | -1.77% |
| Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) | |||
TTAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAM has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTAM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAM | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| EXP - TTAM | 69% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| MLM - TTAM | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| CRH - TTAM | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| AMRZ - TTAM | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| VMC - TTAM | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||