CX
Price
$11.19
Change
-$0.11 (-0.97%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.31B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTAM
Price
$16.01
Change
+$0.20 (+1.27%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.91B
92 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CX vs TTAM

CX vs TTAM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. TTAM commentary
Aug 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a Hold and TTAM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2026
Stock price -- (CX: $11.30 vs. TTAM: $15.81)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. TTAM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 178% vs. TTAM: 51%
Market capitalization -- CX: $16.31B vs. TTAM: $2.91B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $16.31B. TTAM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $2.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $66.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $12.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TTAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CX is a better buy in the long-term than TTAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TTAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTAM is a better buy in the short-term than CX.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а -4.56% price change this week, while TTAM (@Construction Materials) price change was -0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -2.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

TTAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-2.45% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($16.3B) has a higher market cap than TTAM($2.92B). CX has higher P/E ratio than TTAM: CX (36.87) vs TTAM (16.47). CX YTD gains are higher at: -1.210 vs. TTAM (-3.615). CX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.72B vs. TTAM (378M). CX has more cash in the bank: 654M vs. TTAM (65.7M). TTAM has less debt than CX: TTAM (574M) vs CX (7.46B). CX has higher revenues than TTAM: CX (17B) vs TTAM (1.71B).
CXTTAMCX / TTAM
Capitalization16.3B2.92B559%
EBITDA1.72B378M456%
Gain YTD-1.210-3.61533%
P/E Ratio36.8716.47224%
Revenue17B1.71B993%
Total Cash654M65.7M995%
Total Debt7.46B574M1,300%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX: Fundamental Ratings
CX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXTTAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBNV31.52N/A
+0.01%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Nov
WEA10.49N/A
N/A
Western Asset Premier
IBMR25.26N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bd ETF
TSIC25.62N/A
N/A
Truth Social American Icons ETF
TMSL44.22-0.20
-0.44%
T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF

CX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
-0.26%
CRH - CX
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
TTAM - CX
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
AMRZ - CX
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
MLM - CX
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
EXP - CX
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
More

TTAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAM has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTAM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTAM
1D Price
Change %
TTAM100%
-1.25%
EXP - TTAM
71%
Closely correlated
-1.54%
MLM - TTAM
66%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
CRH - TTAM
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
VMC - TTAM
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
AMRZ - TTAM
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
More