CPAY
Price
$319.94
Change
+$0.57 (+0.18%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
22.59B
62 days until earnings call
HUBS
Price
$464.31
Change
-$8.40 (-1.78%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
24.47B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPAY vs HUBS

Header iconCPAY vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts CPAY vs HUBSBanner chart's image
Corpay
Price$319.94
Change+$0.57 (+0.18%)
Volume$265.39K
Capitalization22.59B
HUBSPOT
Price$464.31
Change-$8.40 (-1.78%)
Volume$1.06M
Capitalization24.47B
CPAY vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPAY vs. HUBS commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAY is a StrongBuy and HUBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CPAY: $319.94 vs. HUBS: $464.31)
Brand notoriety: CPAY and HUBS are both not notable
CPAY represents the Computer Communications, while HUBS is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPAY: 56% vs. HUBS: 113%
Market capitalization -- CPAY: $22.59B vs. HUBS: $24.47B
CPAY [@Computer Communications] is valued at $22.59B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $24.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.78T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.02B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPAY is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPAY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than CPAY.

Price Growth

CPAY (@Computer Communications) experienced а -1.61% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.68%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPAY is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-0.45% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-2.62% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($24.5B) has a higher market cap than CPAY($22.6B). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than CPAY: HUBS (7023.44) vs CPAY (21.75). CPAY YTD gains are higher at: -5.461 vs. HUBS (-33.363). CPAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.22B vs. HUBS (126M). CPAY has more cash in the bank: 2.19B vs. HUBS (1.67B). HUBS has less debt than CPAY: HUBS (281M) vs CPAY (8.12B). CPAY has higher revenues than HUBS: CPAY (4.17B) vs HUBS (2.85B).
CPAYHUBSCPAY / HUBS
Capitalization22.6B24.5B92%
EBITDA2.22B126M1,763%
Gain YTD-5.461-33.36316%
P/E Ratio21.757023.440%
Revenue4.17B2.85B146%
Total Cash2.19B1.67B131%
Total Debt8.12B281M2,889%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPAY vs HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
CPAY
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6074
SMR RATING
1..100
3091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6083
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5680
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPAY's Valuation (67) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

CPAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (74) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

CPAY's SMR Rating (30) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

CPAY's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (83) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

CPAY's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (80) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPAYHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLCG31.590.29
+0.93%
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Gr ETF
FLMB22.950.11
+0.47%
Franklin Municipal Green Bond ETF
BFZ10.470.03
+0.29%
BLACKROCK CA Municipal
MLPA49.55-0.03
-0.06%
Global X MLP ETF
FLYU59.89-0.14
-0.23%
MicroSectors™ Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs

CPAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPAY has been loosely correlated with WEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPAY jumps, then WEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAY
1D Price
Change %
CPAY100%
+0.18%
WEX - CPAY
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.70%
EEFT - CPAY
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
HUBS - CPAY
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
SSNC - CPAY
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
ADSK - CPAY
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
-1.78%
CRM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
-4.85%
TEAM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
NOW - HUBS
68%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
S - HUBS
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
CLSK - HUBS
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.81%
More