CPF
Price
$28.05
Change
-$0.66 (-2.30%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
756.83M
73 days until earnings call
FFBC
Price
$24.66
Change
-$0.27 (-1.08%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPF vs FFBC

Header iconCPF vs FFBC Comparison
Open Charts CPF vs FFBCBanner chart's image
Central Pacific Financial
Price$28.05
Change-$0.66 (-2.30%)
Volume$347.46K
Capitalization756.83M
First Financial Ban
Price$24.66
Change-$0.27 (-1.08%)
Volume$621.97K
Capitalization2.34B
CPF vs FFBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPF vs. FFBC commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPF is a Hold and FFBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CPF: $28.05 vs. FFBC: $24.66)
Brand notoriety: CPF and FFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPF: 208% vs. FFBC: 159%
Market capitalization -- CPF: $756.83M vs. FFBC: $2.34B
CPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $756.83M. FFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CPF and FFBC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFBC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FFBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than CPF.

Price Growth

CPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.28% price change this week, while FFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.34B) has a higher market cap than CPF($757M). CPF has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: CPF (12.52) vs FFBC (9.86). CPF YTD gains are higher at: -1.549 vs. FFBC (-6.520). FFBC has more cash in the bank: 191M vs. CPF (77.8M). CPF has less debt than FFBC: CPF (162M) vs FFBC (1.15B). FFBC has higher revenues than CPF: FFBC (841M) vs CPF (253M).
CPFFFBCCPF / FFBC
Capitalization757M2.34B32%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.549-6.52024%
P/E Ratio12.529.86127%
Revenue253M841M30%
Total Cash77.8M191M41%
Total Debt162M1.15B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPF vs FFBC: Fundamental Ratings
CPF
FFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
866
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4026
SMR RATING
1..100
2715
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5659
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4954
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (55). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (40). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (27). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (59). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (54). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPFFFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NMIEX13.540.04
+0.30%
Northern Active M International Equity
HGOAX65.250.04
+0.06%
Hartford Growth Opportunities A
HEQCX5.70-0.02
-0.35%
Monteagle Opportunity Equity Instl
FSMVX30.27-0.20
-0.66%
Fidelity Mid Cap Value
WPGSX10.82-0.09
-0.82%
WPG Partners Select Small Cap Value Ins

CPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPF has been closely correlated with FCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CPF jumps, then FCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPF
1D Price
Change %
CPF100%
-2.30%
FCF - CPF
83%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
STBA - CPF
82%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
FFBC - CPF
81%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
HFWA - CPF
81%
Closely correlated
-2.77%
FMBH - CPF
81%
Closely correlated
-2.82%
More