Ad is loading...
CPF
Price
$31.03
Change
+$0.13 (+0.42%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
72 days until earnings call
FSEA
Price
$9.11
Change
-$0.08 (-0.87%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CPF vs FSEA

Header iconCPF vs FSEA Comparison
Open Charts CPF vs FSEABanner chart's image
Central Pacific Financial
Price$31.03
Change+$0.13 (+0.42%)
Volume$313.34K
CapitalizationN/A
First Seacoast Ban
Price$9.11
Change-$0.08 (-0.87%)
Volume$5.51K
CapitalizationN/A
CPF vs FSEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPF vs. FSEA commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPF is a Sell and FSEA is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CPF: $31.03 vs. FSEA: $9.11)
Brand notoriety: CPF and FSEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPF: 135% vs. FSEA: 64%
Market capitalization -- CPF: $524.15M vs. FSEA: $42.93M
CPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $524.15M. FSEA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $42.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFSEA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FSEA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPF is a better buy in the long-term than FSEA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.07% price change this week, while FSEA (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPF is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

FSEA is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPF($524M) has a higher market cap than FSEA($42.9M). FSEA has higher P/E ratio than CPF: FSEA (35.97) vs CPF (8.93). CPF YTD gains are higher at: 63.475 vs. FSEA (18.466). FSEA has less debt than CPF: FSEA (44.9M) vs CPF (187M). CPF has higher revenues than FSEA: CPF (247M) vs FSEA (13.6M).
CPFFSEACPF / FSEA
Capitalization524M42.9M1,221%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD63.47518.466344%
P/E Ratio8.9335.9725%
Revenue247M13.6M1,816%
Total Cash109MN/A-
Total Debt187M44.9M416%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPF: Fundamental Ratings
CPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
83
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IUENX25.42-0.20
-0.78%
JPMorgan International Focus R6
WAMFX24.19-0.25
-1.02%
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
SBRVX16.18-0.19
-1.16%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ret
OIGNX34.55-0.42
-1.20%
Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr R
BSDAX13.39-0.32
-2.33%
BlackRock SMID-Cap Growth Equity Inv A

CPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPF has been closely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CPF jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPF
1D Price
Change %
CPF100%
+0.42%
NWBI - CPF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
TRST - CPF
80%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
FFBC - CPF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
FCF - CPF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
BUSE - CPF
79%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
More

FSEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSEA has been loosely correlated with HBNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSEA jumps, then HBNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSEA
1D Price
Change %
FSEA100%
-0.82%
HBNC - FSEA
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
BANR - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
HTBI - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
CPF - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
ABCB - FSEA
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
More