Advertisement
CPRT vs LOW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Copart (CPRT) vs. Lowe's (LOW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Copart operates a global online vehicle auction platform focused on salvage and used vehicles, while Lowe's is a major home improvement retailer serving consumers and professionals.
- Over the past year, CPRT shares have declined approximately 46%, significantly underperforming the broader market, whereas LOW has posted modest positive returns amid sector pressures.
- Recent market activity shows CPRT trading near multi-year lows with upcoming quarterly results, contrasted by LOW's cautious sales outlook and mixed analyst sentiment in the home improvement space.
- Sector exposure differs markedly: CPRT benefits from insurance-driven total loss trends and international buyer growth, while LOW faces housing market headwinds and focuses on productivity initiatives.
- Relative performance highlights trade-offs, with CPRT offering potential value at depressed levels and LOW demonstrating greater price stability despite recent monthly declines.
- Market sentiment for both remains tempered, with CPRT analysts maintaining a consensus hold rating and LOW seeing selective target adjustments amid retail challenges.
Introduction
This comparison examines two distinct publicly traded companies, Copart (CPRT) and Lowe's (LOW), to provide traders and investors with a clear view of their relative positioning in the current market environment. CPRT specializes in online vehicle auctions, primarily serving the insurance and salvage sectors, while LOW operates as a leading home improvement retailer with a broad consumer and professional customer base. The analysis appeals to those evaluating sector diversification, momentum differences, and risk-reward profiles across cyclical and consumer-driven industries. By focusing on recent performance trends, business fundamentals, and observable catalysts, the comparison supports informed decision-making for portfolio allocation without speculation on future outcomes.
Copart Overview and Recent Performance
Copart, Inc. runs a technology-enabled global marketplace for buying and selling salvage, used, and wholesale vehicles through its online platform. In recent market activity, shares have experienced notable downward pressure, trading near the lower end of their 52-week range following extended underperformance relative to major indices. Factors influencing sentiment include softer unit volumes from key insurance clients and broader economic caution affecting transaction activity. Despite these headwinds, the company continues to highlight growth in international participation and its virtual bidding technology as supporting elements in its operational model. Overall, recent weeks have reflected a period of consolidation amid anticipation of upcoming quarterly updates.
Lowe's Overview and Recent Performance
Lowe's Companies, Inc. is a prominent home improvement retailer offering products and services for home repair, remodeling, and maintenance to both do-it-yourself consumers and professional contractors. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience on a year-to-date basis compared to broader benchmarks, though it has encountered pullbacks amid cautious forward guidance on comparable sales. Influences on performance include ongoing softness in the housing market and management emphasis on operational efficiency measures. Recent weeks have featured mixed analyst commentary alongside preparations for quarterly earnings, with the company maintaining focus on its pro and digital channels as key growth areas.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI trading bots on its Trending AI Robots page, where hundreds of algorithmic strategies are available to trade thousands of different tickers across equities, options, and other instruments. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent historical metrics, and robust risk parameters earn placement in this highlighted section. Available bots exhibit varied trading styles, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many showing win rates in the 55-75% range and average trade durations spanning from intraday to multi-week periods. Investors exploring automated approaches can review detailed backtested results, drawdown profiles, and ticker-specific suitability directly on the platform. This resource offers a professional entry point for those seeking data-driven trading tools tailored to current conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business model terms, CPRT derives revenue from auction fees and vehicle remarketing in a B2B-focused environment, contrasting with LOW's retail-oriented approach centered on product sales and installation services. Growth drivers for CPRT include rising total loss frequency in the auto insurance sector and expanding global buyer networks, whereas LOW relies on housing turnover, renovation spending, and its professional customer segment. Recent momentum has favored LOW on a relative basis, with more stable year-to-date returns compared to CPRT's extended drawdown. Risk factors differ as well: CPRT faces volume variability tied to insurance cycles and competitive auction dynamics, while LOW contends with macroeconomic sensitivity in consumer spending and supply chain considerations. Sector exposure places CPRT within industrials and specialty services, set against LOW's consumer discretionary retail positioning, creating distinct market sentiment profiles driven by insurance trends versus housing and retail data.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to LOW due to its comparatively steadier performance trajectory and lower recent volatility versus broader market benchmarks. CPRT exhibits potential for recovery given its depressed valuation and underlying business resilience, yet the AI assessment notes greater variability in recent momentum signals. The outlook remains conditional on upcoming earnings visibility and sector-specific catalysts, underscoring the value of ongoing monitoring rather than static conclusions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsTo compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPRT is a StrongBuy and LOW is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLOW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CPRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LOW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- LOW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CPRT (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -2.71% price change this week, while LOW (@Home Improvement Chains) price change was -2.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.24%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was +2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
CPRT is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.
LOW is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.93% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Home Improvement Chains (+2.93% weekly)The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.
| CPRT | LOW | CPRT / LOW | |
| Capitalization | 27.3B | 120B | 23% |
| EBITDA | 1.92B | 12.6B | 15% |
| Gain YTD | -24.700 | -10.268 | 241% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.31 | 18.12 | 101% |
| Revenue | 4.64B | 88.4B | 5% |
| Total Cash | 4.2B | 786M | 534% |
| Total Debt | 93.1M | 42.5B | 0% |
CPRT | LOW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 4 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LOW's Valuation (3) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPRT (84) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew significantly faster than CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
LOW's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as CPRT (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew similarly to CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
LOW's SMR Rating (4) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPRT (50) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
LOW's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as CPRT (64) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew similarly to CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
LOW's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPRT (89) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
| CPRT | LOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 58% | 27 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 61% | 9 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
CPRT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPRT has been loosely correlated with FND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPRT jumps, then FND could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPRT | 100% | -2.48% | ||
| FND - CPRT | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.24% | ||
| WSM - CPRT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| RH - CPRT | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| HD - CPRT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| LOW - CPRT | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.51% | ||
More | ||||
LOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.