CPS
Price
$27.02
Change
-$0.73 (-2.63%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
479.75M
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHIN
Price
$77.18
Change
-$0.96 (-1.23%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.86B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPS vs PHIN

CPS vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPS vs. PHIN commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPS is a StrongBuy and PHIN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CPS: $27.02 vs. PHIN: $77.18)
Brand notoriety: CPS and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPS: 69% vs. PHIN: 61%
Market capitalization -- CPS: $479.75M vs. PHIN: $2.86B
CPS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $479.75M. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $72.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the long-term than CPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPS is a better buy in the short-term than PHIN.

Price Growth

CPS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -3.47% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -3.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.12% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($2.86B) has a higher market cap than CPS($480M). CPS has higher P/E ratio than PHIN: CPS (24.04) vs PHIN (21.62). PHIN YTD gains are higher at: 24.110 vs. CPS (-17.697). PHIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 447M vs. CPS (155M). PHIN has less debt than CPS: PHIN (1.04B) vs CPS (1.24B). PHIN has higher revenues than CPS: PHIN (3.57B) vs CPS (2.76B).
CPSPHINCPS / PHIN
Capitalization480M2.86B17%
EBITDA155M447M35%
Gain YTD-17.69724.110-73%
P/E Ratio24.0421.62111%
Revenue2.76B3.57B77%
Total Cash118MN/A-
Total Debt1.24B1.04B120%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPS: Fundamental Ratings
CPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
64
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPSPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEZ27.510.11
+0.40%
iShares US Oil Equipment & Services ETF
AVL49.07N/A
N/A
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares
CPSP26.96-0.01
-0.05%
CALAMOS S&P 500 STRUCTURED ALT PROTECTION ETF - APRIL
IBIH25.62-0.03
-0.14%
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term Tips ETF
EQWL130.00-0.33
-0.25%
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF

CPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPS has been loosely correlated with MGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPS jumps, then MGA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPS
1D Price
Change %
CPS100%
-2.63%
MGA - CPS
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
ALV - CPS
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
PHIN - CPS
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
LEA - CPS
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
VC - CPS
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.85%
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
-1.23%
LEA - PHIN
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
DAN - PHIN
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
MGA - PHIN
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
BWA - PHIN
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
THRM - PHIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
More