CPS
Price
$28.66
Change
-$0.97 (-3.27%)
Updated
Jun 23, 03:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
526.09M
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHIN
Price
$80.44
Change
-$0.89 (-1.09%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.01B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPS vs PHIN

CPS vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPS vs. PHIN commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPS is a Hold and PHIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CPS: $29.63 vs. PHIN: $81.33)
Brand notoriety: CPS and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPS: 90% vs. PHIN: 124%
Market capitalization -- CPS: $526.09M vs. PHIN: $3.01B
CPS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $526.09M. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $70.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CPS and PHIN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPS is a better buy in the short-term than PHIN.

Price Growth

CPS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +0.89% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -2.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.08% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($3.01B) has a higher market cap than CPS($526M). CPS has higher P/E ratio than PHIN: CPS (24.04) vs PHIN (22.78). PHIN YTD gains are higher at: 30.783 vs. CPS (-9.747). PHIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 447M vs. CPS (155M). PHIN has less debt than CPS: PHIN (1.04B) vs CPS (1.24B). PHIN has higher revenues than CPS: PHIN (3.57B) vs CPS (2.76B).
CPSPHINCPS / PHIN
Capitalization526M3.01B17%
EBITDA155M447M35%
Gain YTD-9.74730.783-32%
P/E Ratio24.0422.78106%
Revenue2.76B3.57B77%
Total Cash118MN/A-
Total Debt1.24B1.04B120%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPS: Fundamental Ratings
CPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPSPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTXL297.057.85
+2.71%
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
BJAN58.79-0.07
-0.12%
Innovator US Equity Buff ETF™ Jan
FXA69.32-0.13
-0.19%
Invesco CcyShrs® Australian Dllr Trust
AFGR36.20-0.37
-1.01%
First Trust Active Factor Lrg Cp Gr ETF
MSTW4.33-0.16
-3.65%
Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF

CPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPS has been loosely correlated with MGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPS jumps, then MGA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPS
1D Price
Change %
CPS100%
-0.64%
MGA - CPS
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
ALV - CPS
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
PHIN - CPS
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
VC - CPS
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.44%
LEA - CPS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+0.68%
ALV - PHIN
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
LEA - PHIN
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
VC - PHIN
56%
Loosely correlated
+5.44%
THRM - PHIN
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
SMP - PHIN
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
More