CQP
Price
$68.38
Change
-$0.29 (-0.42%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
33.1B
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMC
Price
$34.11
Change
-$0.58 (-1.67%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
470.16M
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQP vs SMC

CQP vs SMC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. SMC commentary
Aug 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a Hold and SMC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CQP: $68.38 vs. SMC: $34.11)
Brand notoriety: CQP and SMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 64% vs. SMC: 87%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $33.1B vs. SMC: $470.16M
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $33.1B. SMC’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $470.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $110.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the long-term than SMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CQP and SMC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -0.97% price change this week, while SMC (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -2.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

SMC is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.11% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQP($33.1B) has a higher market cap than SMC($470M). CQP has higher P/E ratio than SMC: CQP (12.41) vs SMC (5.74). CQP YTD gains are higher at: 33.023 vs. SMC (27.849). CQP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.57B vs. SMC (199M). SMC has less debt than CQP: SMC (1.27B) vs CQP (14.2B). CQP has higher revenues than SMC: CQP (11.5B) vs SMC (569M).
CQPSMCCQP / SMC
Capitalization33.1B470M7,043%
EBITDA4.57B199M2,298%
Gain YTD33.02327.849119%
P/E Ratio12.415.74216%
Revenue11.5B569M2,021%
Total CashN/A43.4M-
Total Debt14.2B1.27B1,122%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs SMC: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
SMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8576
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5430
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3748

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CQP's Valuation (16) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMC (54). This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMC (100). This means that CQP’s stock grew significantly faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (4) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMC (91). This means that CQP’s stock grew significantly faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.

SMC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (44). This means that SMC’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

SMC's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (54). This means that SMC’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPSMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CQP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSIWX18.460.17
+0.93%
Morgan Stanley Inst EMkts Ldrs IR
CSVZX49.380.41
+0.84%
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst
PMBMX38.470.31
+0.81%
Principal MidCap R3
MJRFX26.470.19
+0.72%
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value K
RSGRX36.470.21
+0.58%
Victory RS Growth A

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with PAGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then PAGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
-0.42%
PAGP - CQP
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
PAA - CQP
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
EPD - CQP
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
WES - CQP
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
GEL - CQP
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
More

SMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMC has been loosely correlated with TRGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMC jumps, then TRGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMC
1D Price
Change %
SMC100%
-1.67%
TRGP - SMC
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
CQP - SMC
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
LNG - SMC
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
HESM - SMC
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
OKE - SMC
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
More